Gajim - 2025-10-01


  1. tspompey

    good morning

  2. tspompey

    pls can can i regain my account

  3. lovetox

    No idea what you are talking about

  4. tspompey

    vclub account

  5. esus

    Hello, I have had problems with gajim not working in suckless dwm in debian. It is as the keyring manager will not launch and for whatever reason gajim refuses to work even after I enter my account password into gajim.

  6. esus

    It will just be stuck on "connecting".

  7. esus

    I works in dwm now after I launched it and logged on in lxqt.

  8. esus

    I told it to remember my password.

  9. esus

    Be aware I am using the latest version in the deban trixie repo which is 2.1.1

  10. ivan

    The latest version seems to be available but there is no news article announcing it on the website.

  11. cal0pteryx

    ivan: an article will follow soon-ish

    👍 1
  12. nicoco

    lovetox, with SFS support do you plan to add multiattachment in a single message? I remember you were against the idea of the example where the sources arrive later than the "multiattachment message", but what if sources are (also) in the first message?

  13. lovetox

    yes i find it complex, but after thinking about it, it is the only way to stay backwards compatible

  14. lovetox

    my current draft supports the XEP also with multi source messages

  15. nicoco

    oh ok.

  16. nicoco

    I was thinking I'll probably implement "all sources in the first message" then "following messages with sources too" just to be compatible with gajim

  17. nicoco

    I was thinking I'll probably implement "all sources in the first message" then "following (fallback) messages with sources too" just to be compatible with gajim

  18. lovetox

    as gajim does not implement yet anything i would not assume we will implement it in a certain way

  19. lovetox

    implement it, and decide after gajim implements it

  20. nicoco

    hehe OK, I don't think I want to take the lead on this this will be the other way around.

  21. nicoco

    I was initially excited by multiattachment messages as I though it would mean dropping *a lot* of complexity in slidge, but this will probably just add more as I want it to be backwards compatible anyway xD

  22. lovetox

    but dino supports it

  23. nicoco

    dino already does? really?

  24. lovetox

    soo you can look alrady at impl

  25. lovetox

    also kaidan

  26. nicoco

    multiattachment in a single message, or just SFS?

  27. lovetox

    .. yeah maybe they dont

  28. lovetox

    i just tested with one file

  29. lovetox

    but would they not need to support it receiving wise?

  30. lovetox

    they probably send out only one file

  31. lovetox

    but maybe they support receiving multiple

  32. nicoco

    I will have a look you managed to tickle my curiosity now

    👍 1
  33. lovetox

    nicoco, but Gajim will definitly support receiving multiple <filesharing> elements in one message

  34. lovetox

    it also depends what we count as backwards compatible

  35. lovetox

    you can simply put multiple links into the body, this would still count for me as backwards compatible, other clients can click the links

  36. bot

    lovetox pushed 1 commits to branch python-nbxmpp/master feat: Add support for reaction restrictions - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/python-nbxmpp/-/commit/b6aceffd1d4f02e177261b0445a3bb0130501e81

  37. bot

    lovetox pushed 1 commits to branch gajim/master feat: Reactions: Add support for max_reactions_per_user - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/8e119c4afd0a779cc90fbaf85026f09a1b35c4be