Gajim - 2025-08-24


  1. a moderator removed a message

    Spam

  2. a moderator removed a message

    Spam

  3. a moderator removed a message

    Spam

  4. a moderator removed a message

    Spam

  5. a moderator removed a message

    Spam

  6. a moderator removed a message

    Spam

  7. a moderator removed a message

    Spam

  8. a moderator removed a message

    Spam

  9. a moderator removed a message

    Spam

  10. debacle

    If there are many consecutive, identical moderation notices, it would be nice, if Gajim could squash them. E.g. to: > This message has been moderated by gajim@conference.gajim.org/cal0pteryx (reason: Spam) > (9 times)

  11. lovetox

    yes would be nice, but i have no idea how to do that, so .. will probably not happen

  12. cal0pteryx

    Maybe we could hide consecutive rows just like we do for meta infos in consecutive messages. Just that we hide the full row

  13. lovetox

    yes that should be possible, but also makes it impossible to do any actions with these hidden rows in the future

  14. bot

    wurstsalat pushed 1 commits to branch gajim/master change: Contact info: Show full contact dialog if we know a contact's real JID - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/75e93ec5cef955dd69bc03b6848a242e93dbd6b4

  15. danielstein

    Symmetric encryption afaik is not that vulnerable as async enc

  16. danielstein

    Só our AES GCM 256 links are still safe

  17. danielstein

    If you dont share the commen secret

  18. danielstein

    Asbasync encrryotiob requirses on some computional power tonsolve a onde way function

  19. danielstein

    Like RSA daa

  20. danielstein

    Dsa

  21. bot

    wurstsalat pushed 1 commits to branch gajim/master fix: Group chats: Display subject only if it has text - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/017e696ece8ff053b072e5a7c7d85f1021e291f8

  22. mesonium

    > yes that should be possible, but also makes it impossible to do any actions with these hidden rows in the future Woudln't it be possible to implement a button to expand the collpased rows? I'd want to have something like this for picture flood walls

  23. lovetox

    not to my knowledge, a row is a message, you would need to redesign everything so that a row does not correspond to a message anymore

  24. lovetox

    then you could try to have a listbox within a row, and display there stuff grouped

  25. mesonium

    Was there a particular choice to use a listbox and not a listview? I read here that for dynamic lists with abitrarily number of items the latter is recommended from gtk side.

  26. lovetox

    listview exists only since gtk4

  27. lovetox

    and its only recommended for 10.000+ items

  28. lovetox

    the API is much more complicated, you need to design reusable widgets that can be bound to the data

    👍 1
  29. moparisthebest

    > That's a security issue deutschland: image upload is not a security issue... Your video is the same as if I sent you a message and you copy and pasted it to another chat and said "look it's insecure the message is in another chat" ...

  30. lovetox

    in general, yes it would be cool if we had a listview, but it would not be a noticeable difference for the user

  31. mesonium

    https://discourse.gnome.org/t/listbox-or-listview/6669/3 > if you have a variable number of rows, that the maximum number won’t get near 100. use a ListBox. Where did you get the 10k from?

  32. lovetox

    no idea anymore, from some doc site, thats what it was created for, for huge data amounts

  33. lovetox

    we dont have so many rows loaded at a time

  34. lovetox

    100-200 .. does not matter as long as you dont go a magnitude higher

    👍 1
  35. mesonium

    Alright. So many things one could try and explore, but so little time :-.

  36. mesonium

    Alright. So many things one could try and explore, but so little time :-/

  37. lovetox

    i would not explore it if there is not a concrete problem to solve

  38. lovetox

    i dont see one with the listbox currently

  39. lovetox

    at least not one, that you dont also have in the listview (like scrolling correctly)

  40. mesonium

    > in general, yes it would be cool if we had a listview, but it would not be a noticeable difference for the user So why would it be cool then if you don't see any advantages?

  41. lovetox

    from a technical perspective, working with listmodels and Gtk draws and recycles rows as needed seems like the correct way to do this

  42. mesonium

    alrighty.

  43. lovetox

    but its also a bit problematic i think with python, as long as you dont need your own listmodel impl i think its fine

  44. lovetox

    but when you do, i guess stuff gets a lot slower

  45. bot

    wurstsalat pushed 1 commits to branch gajim/master fix: Dark mode: Fix switching dark/light mode for some elements - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/f1431973163e2304e0f261d11e5e620062d7114e

  46. bot

    wurstsalat pushed 1 commits to branch gajim/master fix: Contact info: Fix initial subscription switch state - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/91c6024251895d5253a0b9ef71a6ccdf714ce959

  47. bot

    wurstsalat pushed 2 commits to branch gajim/master imprv: Start chat: Dim 'Start / Join chat' icon - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/330a24837b172f2cf4854faee67a4d17bd1d88e9 cq: Start chat: Improve type annotations - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/586e1b50a34fa91d41b81bd5ac55efd8eedc27df

  48. bot

    wurstsalat pushed 1 commits to branch gajim/master cq: Icons: Improve custom icons test - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/a75d9d7f1117c0813ebeac1c52c5d65c16237bd9

  49. gerdofel

    hey guys if i implement an XEP I like what are the chances of it getting merged?

  50. gerdofel

    hey guys if I implement an XEP I like what are the chances of it getting merged?

  51. cal0pteryx

    gerdofel: tell us a bit more :)

  52. mimi89999

    Was https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/issues/11596 eventually fixed?

  53. lovetox

    yes

  54. lovetox

    thats why the issue is closed ..

  55. mimi89999

    But the fix was reverted

  56. mimi89999

    https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/56bebd9059639a169114871822d3bf9653a4a92f

  57. alexg

    Anyone here right now?

  58. alexg

    What's up