Gajim - 2025-03-13

https://discourse.imfreedom.org/t/pidgin-3-0-experimental-1-has-been-released/227

All better then pidgin imo

But i agree I miss possibility showing roster. For some multi acc setups it is just better

Workspace sticky ACC's cannot substitute this

Hello everyone, Excuse me, what is a roster

A roster is the buddy list, also known as "contact list".

alright, thanks.

Can someone help me test https://codeberg.org/iNPUTmice/Conversations/pulls/533 ? https://xmpp-upload.lockywolf.net:5281/file_share/W5KtoOTwwBUqpD5l3lQtqAAs/Conversations-2.17.12-conversations-free-universal-release-unsigned.apk

I am interested in both Conversations screen sharing working by itself, and when calling to Gajim

http://vultr-seoul-openbsd.lockywolf.net/lockywolf/Conversations-2.17.12-conversations-free-universal-debug.apk

Pedro Ataíde (movim.eu): why ist the contact list in the start chat dialog, not list enough to scroll through your contacts?

We moved the list into this dialog, not removed it

> Ok ok you get a full refund for what you paid them then ❤️ ↺

I'm curious, would P2P file exchange be possible with Gajim? That would be encrypted between the two parties and not using server connections, right?

The Wild: no, it has been disabled for various reasons

Yeah I get that, but could it be re-implemented in a secure way? I'm kinda of enthusiastic about the persecptive of encrypted P2P file transfert via XMPP. Or that was never a thing?

Yes, via omemo jet (jingle encrypted transfers)

I right now installed Gajim 2.0.2 from Debian/testing. Excellent!

cal0pteryx #11017 (Add support for XEP-0447: Stateless file sharing) is not sth. to expect in the near future, right?

Just curious.

debacle: not near, maybe intermediate

I think changing affiliations in MUCs is broken? I've sent a sentry report, should I open a ticket too?

``` Traceback (most recent call last): File "/app/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gajim/gtk/chat_stack.py", line 651, in _on_action client.get_module("MUC").set_affiliation( File "/app/lib/python3.12/site-packages/nbxmpp/task.py", line 107, in func_wrapper return _setup_task(task, self._client, callback, user_data) # type: ignore ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/app/lib/python3.12/site-packages/nbxmpp/task.py", line 86, in _setup_task task.add_done_callback(callback) File "/app/lib/python3.12/site-packages/nbxmpp/task.py", line 182, in add_done_callback raise ValueError("Unknown callback object") ValueError: Unknown callback object ```

There is a ticket already, thanks

https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/issues/12219

lovetox, I'm afk, but looks like the context manager closes the session right away too early and .scalars() opens another connection afterwards, which doesn't get closed anymore

> We moved the list into this dialog, not removed it You are wrong. That is a search tool, not a Contact List. I know what a list is. Also, the search tool does not distinguish between accounts! Before this feature was removed, we had a Contact List for each account, as it should be! We want the old Gajim developers back. ✏ ↺

It seems that this project has been sabotaged.

Pedro Ataíde (movim.eu): I tried to als you an honest question. What makes the one list worse than the other list

You had a search also im the old contact list so that cannot be it

And every list needs a search anyway ✏

wurstsalat pushed 1 commits to branch gajim/master fix: AdHoc: Don't fail if dataform widget is not set when cancelling - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/36e96a3dc47976bd3d435c9025511d132e40f611

is the original developer of gajim still active?