Gajim - 2025-03-11


  1. Kevin

    > Gajim 2.0.2 has been released 🥳 https://gajim.org/post/2025-03-10-gajim-2.0.2-released/ 🎉

  2. emru

    is it normal that I no longer have gajim incon in the tray?

  3. emru

    is it normal that I no longer have gajim icon in the tray?

  4. emru

    some gtk4 "feature"?

  5. cal0pteryx

    Yes, GTK4 dropped its Status Icon widget. Gajim now implements it via DBus. If your system provides the required interface, you'll have a status icon again.

  6. emru

    I see, thanks

  7. cal0pteryx

    Here you'll find some details https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/issues/12165

  8. Mike Yellow

    https://suchat.org:5443/upload/72100d426ee0a341f79cb126f62c325d03f117fb/bmVcnrxuDXR4N5WOJVjRPzaHlJ5p6zSOUqRiovgN/bugs_x2.png

  9. cal0pteryx

    Mike Yellow: how does that error trigger?

  10. Mike Yellow

    I do not remember I did anything special... I will try to click around and see will it happen again.

  11. debacle

    I get exceptions around `nbxmpp/modules/openpgp.py`: https://conference.gajim.org:5281/pastebin/6c044413-ef6a-4203-856e-98529045b492

  12. lovetox

    Yes me too didn't look into it yet

    🙏 1
  13. someodd

    Mike Yellow: 你好啊

  14. mesonium

    cal0pteryx, when you originally implemented the hack for the input view, had you checked and considuered Dino's solution before or after?

  15. mesonium

    cal0pteryx, when you originally implemented the hack for the input view, had you checked and considered Dino's solution before or after?

  16. mesonium

    cal0pteryx, when you originally implemented the hack for the input view, had you checked and considered Dino's solution?

  17. cal0pteryx

    I'm not aware of Dino's solution

  18. mesonium

    I've checked today:

  19. mesonium

    https://github.com/dino/dino/blob/9a2ef6ba50d598e4b44f42a038465c9e40a6686b/main/src/ui/chat_input/chat_text_view.vala#L115

  20. cal0pteryx

    Does it come with advantages to the current implementation?

  21. mesonium

    I'm not sure if there are significant advantages, but some minor UX improvements. Can try to enumerate them later.

  22. Codimp

    Hello here, just to say I see this XEP promoted to experimental: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0503.html If I understand it well maybe we can synchronise Gajim workspaces with this, am I right?

  23. Codimp

    hum, my bad, it seems to be only to group channels on server side but not for users to synchronise in PEP

  24. bot

    lovetox pushed 1 commits to branch python-nbxmpp/master fix: OpenPGP: Depreacted pubkey date attribute - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/python-nbxmpp/-/commit/7e9071d750a563407c4ef80da0fe53db79a7480b

  25. bot

    lovetox pushed 1 commits to branch python-nbxmpp/master release: 6.0.2 - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/python-nbxmpp/-/commit/5cdc260c883825e0febad7f4b11766aa73e5d147

  26. lovetox

    ^ debacle, and new openpgp plugin release

  27. lovetox

    should fix the error you are seeng

  28. debacle

    > ^ debacle, and new openpgp plugin release Thank you! Uploaded both to Debian.

  29. bot

    wurstsalat pushed 1 commits to branch gajim/master fix: ChatControl: Handle autoscroll-changed without active chat - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/0dd018f50357a306c9beba5474510ae30ef834be

  30. lovetox

    so to all that have problems with read markers

  31. lovetox

    i tried now with a simple test, and did not find any problem, if the window is not focused it does not send a read marker

  32. lovetox

    at least with a simple test, this does not mean there is not some condition where this is not ture

  33. lovetox

    at least with a simple test, this does not mean there is not some condition where this is not true

  34. lovetox

    just that its not reproducible with this simple test

  35. lovetox

    hm i found that it seems our scrolled up detection does not work, meaning if im in the same chat and not at the bottom of the history, Gajim still sends a read maker

  36. lovetox

    hm i found that it seems our scrolled up detection does not work, meaning if im in the same chat and not at the bottom of the history, Gajim still sends a read marker

  37. bot

    lovetox pushed 1 commits to branch gajim/master fix: Chat: Send read marker only when chat is at bottom - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/a9990c5c8874ae9311ecd06bb9735e04308537a0