-
debacle
https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Sprints/2025-05_Berlin
-
mesonium
> wurstsalat pushed 1 commits to branch gajim/master > > refactor: Split Gtk utils into modules - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/1591862dc99ef66de38dc1f957624ea7e104512a > > concerto, I'd guess it has to do with✎ ↺ -
mesonium
> wurstsalat pushed 1 commits to branch gajim/master > > refactor: Split Gtk utils into modules - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/1591862dc99ef66de38dc1f957624ea7e104512a > > concerto, I'd guess it has to do with ^ ✏ ↺
-
cal0pteryx
Yes but it shouldn't lead to a traceback. I can't reproduce that
-
cal0pteryx
concerto: Check if there is an __init__.py in /gtk/utils/
-
mesonium
> I can't reproduce that me neither
-
mesonium
lovetox, thanks for the hint last time. I got the most trivial part done, but there's still a lot work left. Here's my current poc:
-
mesonium
https://share.conversations.im/meeson_/Os0cQxtpWIT9TXAT/Screenshot_20250206_151709.jpg
-
mesonium
I will slowly keep working on it over the course of the time.
-
concerto
cal0pteryx: `dpkg -L gajim-nightly | grep gtk/utils` returns no results.
-
concerto
...oh, but I see a `gtk/util/__init__.py`
-
MattJ
Does Gajim support modifying the image (i.e. vcard) associated with a MUC room? I'm not sure if it's unsupported, I can't find it in the UI, or I broke something on the server which makes it not show
-
MattJ
Aha, I think it was indeed the server, never mind
-
lovetox
MattJ, Chat Settings -> Manage -> Click edit button on the avatar
-
MattJ
Thanks
-
MattJ
From a UX perspective, it's weird that on the "Information" page there is an edit button next to the name but not the image
π 1 -
MattJ
That page should probably just be read-only or have an edit button that jumps to the Manage page
-
concerto
> From a UX perspective, it's weird that on the "Information" page there is an edit button next to the name but not the image π ↺
-
MattJ
Oh, maybe it's actually editing two different things?
-
MattJ
Yeah, I think the one on the Information is a local alias, I'm guessing?
-
lovetox
yes you can overwrite the name with a local name
-
lovetox
MattJ, i see how it can be confusing at first, but if you think about it, the "Manage" page is only seen by MUC admins
-
MattJ
I see
-
lovetox
would it not also confusing, if you can change all muc config on that page
-
lovetox
except for the avatar?
-
lovetox
but yeah, we could think about that, its definitly an option
-
lovetox
mesonium, good work, im not sure about the displaying stuff as "Message", if that is our goal we could simply add some filter functionality to the chat view
-
lovetox
it also does not look like a interface to find some media fast or get an overview, looks more like a lot of scrolling
-
mesonium
lovetox, I am bit confused: when I send omemo encrypted files, the xml debug console claims > <body>I sent you an OMEMO encrypted message but your client doesnβt seem to support that. but the message is correctly decrypted. I came to this because not all received files contained an oob property, namely the one encrypted with omemo.
-
lovetox
thats a fallback body
π 1 -
mesonium
> im not sure about the displaying stuff as "Message that is going to change, I was just happy to display stuff and copied the code over
-
lovetox
clients that cannot decrypt the message show that
-
lovetox
and yes, omemo message have no indicator that something is a file
-
lovetox
you cannot differentiate this from a simple weblink
-
lovetox
thats simply how it is with OMEMO1 and would not try to work around that necessarily
-
lovetox
the only thing that you could check is if we have a file with the same name on the harddisk
-
mesonium
mm, I see for outgoing omemo messages an `oob_url='aesgcm://` in the log: Couldn't we use that _after_ decryption to store messages containing this kind of payload?
-
mesonium
> the only thing that you could check is if we have a file with the same name on the harddisk at what point and where would I check this? ↺
-
mesonium
> and yes, omemo message have no indicator that something is a file not necessarily always, see two posts above or am I misunderstanding something? :) See you later. ↺
-
lovetox
ah yeah i forgot that we change the schema, yes aesgcm schema hints at it beeing a file
π 1