Gajim - 2024-10-08

maximus: what Linux distribution and version do you use, that has the dark theme issue?

> is it just me or did the channel avatar here disappear? Works for me.

> Hey, somebody noticed :) I was wondering how long it would be flying under the radar :D > So the general idea is to concentrate on the port to GTK4 so it doesn't drag for an extended period of time. This means MRs with GUI changes will probably only be considered after the port, depending on how many parts a change touches. Since there is a separation from GUI/core (at least to some degree), MRs touching non-GUI parts may be easier to consider. The main focus at the moment is to work on the port though It really is an endless bug hunt 🥲️ ↺

Have you seen how many issues Gajim's issue tracker counts? :) Of course we can stand still, do nothing, fix all bugs and be done. But Gajim should get new features right?

Well, there are indeed issues on tracker which stem from gtk3, so ...

cal0pteryx: how do you proceed with the port? How can you test if ported parts work if not the whole codebase has been ported yet? ✏

meson: we started with a minimal working core by disabling stuff that broke. Then we proceeded to enable stuff again, step by step

Sounds like a strategy.

I'll make a list of thing which we still have to fix/check/figure out

I'm currently working on a replacement for the file chooser button (needs cross platform checking), Drag and drop hasn't been ported yet, some signals need to be connected again, Service disco dialog hasn't been touched yet To name a few

Cc gtk4 expert Link Mauve :D I will see if I can help out, but first I keep working on the media browser stuff. :)

meson, GTK now has GtkVideo for playing media stuff.

\o/, will build that in ✏

cal0pteryx, did you manage to get mypy to help with the gi types?

Link Mauve: yes, this has been working for a while now. We're using pyright/pylance in connection with pyGObject-stubs, which helps _a lot_

:)

> maximus: what Linux distribution and version do you use, that has the dark theme issue? don't worry, I didn't have adwaita dark installed on my system, now it works ↺

Well, short update, I got zero response to my mail from 2 weeks ago to the new Fedora package maintainer of Gajim. :-/ ✏

Hello

is anybody having issues with icons for the flatpak package?

what is your issue? ✏

with the latest update, I get a bunch of place holder icons

I'm using fedora 40

and I get a generic white icon with a `!`

it does that for all missing Icons

the tray icon is missing as well

can you make a screenshot so i can see where those missing icons are

as an example:

https://disroot.org/upload/06705727-7fd9-72a0-b905-93a7b136f5e0/db72169a-857e-4e12-af95-8150faaa9821.png

https://disroot.org/upload/06705729-cbbf-7e5c-a9a8-59fef1cc941e/c3e23c02-d560-468e-baa0-2ce3ef16395a.png

https://disroot.org/upload/06705731-509b-7334-989b-125cf07a14f4/c07f5d01-7122-4658-ab17-702d313ed5d0.png

they're all over the place

ok thanks

==MS==: Fedora Gnome or Plasma?

gnome

On Plasma it works fine for me with both Breeze and Adwaita icon themes + Flatlak 1.9.5 ✏

On Plasma it works fine for me with both Breeze and Adwaita icon themes + Flatpak 1.9.5 ✏

I tried other icon sets and it is the same

very weird

some of these icons are gajim shipped ones

so your icon theme should not matter

whats with the gajim icon in the top left?

https://disroot.org/upload/06705778-d879-7024-bc7d-c149ef240493/83605a1e-1a78-486f-b3a2-ec45b8aa0c74.png

did you restart since update? ✏

yes, multiple times

i tried installing other icon sets

not gajim, i mean your machine

> not gajim, i mean your machine yes, that's what I meant ↺

it has nothing to do with icon sets

some of the icons missing are ones that we ship ourself

i would try reinstalling the app, there is really no reason i can think of why the app would no find its own shipped icons

and you are saying it worked in a previous flatpak install?

> and you are saying it worked in a previous flatpak install? yes, perfectly; the icons that are not missing changed to what it seems "older" icons ↺

perhaps is some permission thing with flatpak?

let me try reinstalling gajim

do you install the app with the --user flag?

or via your software store app?

> do you install the app with the --user flag? nope ↺

> or via your software store app? the terminal ↺

I'm reinstalling it now, let's see if it fixes it

I'll report back! 😎️

hmm

maybe i was too fast, it seems all not shipped icons

so it is probably solved by installing a correct icons theme

> so it is probably solved by installing a correct icons theme which one would that be? ↺

nope, not fixed!

no idea sorry, its probably also maybe a problem of activating the icon theme in the right place or telling flatpak which place to look for the icon theme

i think this question is better placed in a flatpak support channel, or fedora support channel

it really is not that important, just annoying

ok

Thanks

as a side note, perhaps you should consider shipping all the icons with the package

as you thought

try a few other flatpak apps, if you see the same problem

will do -- thanks!

Hii

hi, I'm trying PGP encryption with a friend but he's offline now. If I chat him from gajim, the shield is gree but if I chat him from profanity, with the same keys, gajim says it's not trusted, like.. ✏

https://xmpp.woodpeckersnest.space/file_share/Co0dzR5b4Vya284DC9AToN1H/5e0a669f-da0b-48d5-8c01-c424a9be41f3.png

how do I manage trust?

That is a deep question

Let's break out the "Reflections on Trusting Trust" paper!

roughnecks: click the shield icon

lovetox, the shield icon only lets me assign a key to the contact and I already did that

it's PGP, not omemo

Do you need to trust the key on the gpg command line?

I am on Windows and the key is trusted in kleopatra, or do you mean I need to trust it on the machine running profanity? I can try

did you assign your own key in the plugin config?

yes

I sent successfully

at least it looks like that

nope, still orange shield after trusting the key on the machine running profanity

let me see if I need to trust in profanity itself

yeah look at the code, its that way

we dont do any verification for trust or not, and dont read this information out of the gpg process

this plugin simply depends on the gpg binary

as the plugin itself delegates the whole process of trusting to gpg

because we dont read the inforation if gpg conisders the sender trusted, we always return trust undecided

well, I can't find anything related to trust in profanity, while gpg says "ultimate" now (and I also restarted profanity)

will ask on profanity room :)

this has nothing to do with profanity

as said we dont read the information from gpg

test