Gajim - 2024-09-17

fjklp: quoting is something different. You're talking about copying a message, right?

A quote has no timestamp. Neither has a reply

wat

oh lol this pinged me

cal0pteryx: I'm talking that the option 'Select Messages'

Yes, exactly. Copying a message is different to a quote. Quotes are meant to reply to others, while copying messages is typically for archiving purposes

yes

It replicates gajim's previous behavior, where you could copy a whole message line, including its timestamp

I guess I used the wrong term here, but my filed issue used the correct term, I believe

Removing the timestamp would defeat the purpose

it would be nice if there were hints in the description of each date and time string in the ACE that tell us where they have effect. Maybe that's too much trouble to maintain over time.

how would it defeat the purpose?

also, if we could specify time zone - for example UTC - then the exact time would still be contained without revealing the local time of the person copying it

It was explicity asked to contain a timestamp and a nickname, in order to replicate Gajim's previous behavior

Please use "quote message" if you want it without

> Please use "quote message" if you want it without what does this mean? ↺

..or even copy the text by selecting it. There are so many ways

"Quote message" instead of "Copy message"

I see no option that is called "quote message"

> ..or even copy the text by selecting it. There are so many ways sometimes I want to copy multiple lines. I was aiming to do it faster than copy, paste, copy, paste, etc. ↺

but maybe that's what I will be left with

So you're talking about copying multiple messages, that was not clear to me

We will not add stuff to fake your time

"copy messages" for multi selection executes "copy message" for each message selected. And this is exactly the behavior previous gajim versions had, which is what users explicitly asked for

And message only with date makes for most people no sense

Can I use gajim to trust certs of https link manually instead of using system keyring?

and disable https cert verify seems not working

jestar: either you add your cert to your system's cert store or you use a valid cert :)

some android clients have the function to not trust ca and trust certs manually for both c2s and https, and I think it's nice to have it

what is your actual problem?

you have a self signed cert and cant upload to your server?

you make it sound like you want to trust every cert that you encounter when someone sends you a http link

> you have a self signed cert and cant upload to your server? yes, I want to do that. the android conversations client can manage trusted certs in application, and I want to do that with gajim too ↺

So will it be a possible feature?

> you make it sound like you want to trust every cert that you encounter when someone sends you a http link I mean only the file link from xmpp server ✏ ↺

Gajim most likely won't implement an additional cert trust layer, no

Hii

> Gajim most likely won't implement an additional cert trust layer, no then thanks for answering ↺

Seeing random behavior where text just continues to the left and a horizontal scroll appears rather than wrapping to the next line?

The weird part is it's only on one chat

mike, quite likely this… > will be fixed in the next version, it happens when there is a really long word without spaces

Word thanks

I need to run an independent instance of Gajim for testing, how should I do this?

(with firefox I set a temporary directory as HOME and use --no-remote)

betarays: check out Gajim's man page I think the option is -p

(p for profile)

ah, I see, so with `-p tmp -s` everything should be kept in a different directory, that I should be able to delete later?

okay, this allows me to use a different HOME as well

thanks lissine

you're welcome

hi guys

> oh lol this pinged me It shouldn't have, because nicks are case-sensitive ↺

lovetox, % LC_ALL=C pacman -V|sed -r 's#[0-9]+#081#g'|md5sum|cut -c1-6 62c74f

lissine: gajim does not care :)

> lissine: gajim does not care :) but it should It's possible to have two participants whose nicks only differ in the case of the first character ↺

Examples: currently in the prosody channel there's andrew and Andrew, John and john, Prosody and prosody