Gajim - 2024-06-10

do the gajim flatpak other package types like .deb use the same icons for everything? ✏

Depends flatpak can configure it's own icon themes ✏

But in any case it's nothing Gajim decides

Some icons we ship ourself these should be the same

lovetox pushed 1 commits to branch gajim/master ci: Debian: Raise nbxmpp version - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/ec75a9f0e6e6f9573cb6088a09dde0659f1c8429

lovetox pushed 1 commits to branch gajim/master release: 1.9.0 - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/dcf82b29337f0b93239caa77b67b29e299d664a2

well done for the release! gajim keeps growing..

if you think about it, after all these years (I believe more than 20 (?)) we're still here, more alive than ever

I don't think there are many community projects out there this old still maintained

yes really amazing

also kind of lucky that the protocol is still relevant, and maybe becomes even more relevant again if all those chat control stuff gets passed in the EU

you think people might move to existing XMPP servers or host their own because of that?

if all centralized services become highly monitored by government, some group of people will turn again to more decentralized protocols

altough there are of course good competitors in this area, ruling out all centralized services, will have some effect

1.9.0 and friends uploaded to Debian unstable

debacle: I released new versions of the plugins

lovetox pushed 1 commits to branch gajim/master chore: Update README.md - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/d4f5e82015b1489c0dc7661067436690cbe8e9f0

> lovetox pushed 1 commits to branch gajim/master > > chore: Update README.md - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/d4f5e82015b1489c0dc7661067436690cbe8e9f0 🫠🥳 ↺

lovetox I uploaded openpgp, pgp, and triggers this morning, together with gajim and nbxmpp :-)

lovetox I hope, that antispam and lengnotifier are still compatible?

I didn't try to be honest

anyone else having issues with gajim nightly flatpak taking forever to launch on hyprland? i'm pretty sure i have the portals i need installed

Start from console with logging and look what takes so long

> Start from console with logging and look what takes so long ``` (gajim:3): Gdk-WARNING **: 11:43:13.477: Failed to read portal settings: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownMethod: No such interface “org.freedesktop.portal.Settings” on object at path /org/freedesktop/portal/desktop ** (gajim:3): WARNING **: 11:44:04.239: expected enumeration type void, but got PyGLibOptionArg instead 2024-06-10T11:44:04 (E) gajim.c.dbus.system_style Couldn’t read the color-scheme setting: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownMethod: No such interface “org.freedesktop.portal.Settings” on object at path /org/freedesktop/portal/desktop ``` ↺

hannibal: somebody opened a issue with a broken 1.9 report for flatpak. Any idea why this happens?

this is very weird, the import should work ..

i'll try it out on kde wayland in a bit to see if it's different

zayd [telepath], i meant starting gajim with -v

and then you can look where it takes the time

alright let me try that

lovetox, it only starts printing things other than the warning i showed after the gui pops up

then show me the first 10 lines form your full log

> then show me the first 10 lines form your full log a bit hard to do that, i can't seem to get the logs to go into a file with a > and piping them to most doesn't work ↺

apparently my gajim is a bit out of date, maybe updating will help

whats out of date?

my gajim flatpak

flatpak usually offers only the newest version, so why do you think its out of date

you can enable debug logging in preferences

then gajim writes the log to a file

hm hannibal gajim flatpak nightly seems not updated

could you verify that please

> flatpak usually offers only the newest version, so why do you think its out of date i didn't say the flatpak in repos was out of date, i meant that mine wasn't updated to the latest available ↺

> hm hannibal gajim flatpak nightly seems not updated ah i get it, nightly will only be build today ↺

Half a year after the last release, Gajim 1.9.0 is finally here. 🎉 This release brings long awaited support for message replies and message reactions. Message Moderation has been improved as well. Say hello to voice messages! Thank you for all your contributions! https://gajim.org/post/2024-06-10-gajim-1.9.0-released/

just pop in to congratulate on the new features. Looks and works awesome. thanks a lot! ♥️

> its sqlalchemy importing TypeAliasType that was added in python 3.12

my friend having issues with latest database migration

but

it worked for me

we're both using flatpak

yeee apparently typealiastype is python 3.12 only ig

``` flatpak run --command=python org.gajim.Gajim Python 3.11.9 (main, Nov 10 2011, 15:00:00) [GCC 13.2.0] on linux Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import sqlalchemy >>> ```

works for me tho

flatpak run --command=sed org.gajim.Gajim -n '36,57p' /app/lib/python3.11/site-packages/sqlalchemy/util/typing.py

``` from typing_extensions import TypeAliasType as TypeAliasType # 3.12 ```

only difference i think is my friend is on fedora 39

and im on 40

works fine for me ✏

importing that specific meme

ooo

they still had the omemo extension installed :^)

that fixed it

(hopefully)

ok ye that fixed it

ong, thanks for the feedback!

hell ye npnp

we're so back rn

it was the omemo extension the whole time kinda funny how it worked up till now

will take precedence over the newer install if the user hasnt removed it from their flatpak meme

Congrats for 1.9.0 :)

Congrats!

ong, is this yours? https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/issues/11857

nop

u can tell em to remove the omemo flatpak meme tho

the older 1 from like 1.7.3 or somethign

for me it's not apparent what omemo has to do with it when reading the traceback. but let's see

its cause

the old omemo plugin from flatpak shipped its own version of typing_extensions

I see

some users might still have it installed

or forgot they had it installed

I posted a comment in the issue I linked

if i want to complain about icons, should I do it here or make an issue covering all the cases?

I'm using flatpak presently. the paperclip icon on file uploads is clearly low res and should probably be svg or something. For file uploads in public mucs where preview is turned off, it shows a question mark box icon that is tiny. I don't know why some preview boxes (I have no idea what these widgets are supposed to be called) show a paperclip and others don't. Seems like a strange inconsistency. ✏

I feel like gajim could use a real icon overhaul

man, I need to start using a new account instead of this broken gajim one

https://upload.gajim.org:5281/upload/54flCw9qtcBvKW5latngaWF4/7437bf55-fe21-4a9c-85c4-b4da48159ad5.png

> Half a year after the last release, Gajim 1.9.0 is finally here. 🎉 This release brings long awaited support for message replies and message reactions. Message Moderation has been improved as well. Say hello to voice messages! Thank you for all your contributions! > https://gajim.org/post/2024-06-10-gajim-1.9.0-released/ cal0pteryx: Funny enough, FreeBSD just ported 1.8.4 4 days ago xD ↺

see 1.9.0 in 6 months :P

fjklp: please open an issue covering all cases. That documents it in the best way for devs to fix

alright

lovetox: I disclosed a security issue with gajim here: https://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/2024-06-10

robertoo, this is a known issue

gajim will send messages even if the public keys of participants arent resolvable

some servers dont implement pubsub properly

git issue link?

not sure if there is one

i think ideally there should be a dialoge to not encrypted for unresolved participants

on all clients

Please create issue so it can be tracked. Anything I said here or in the XSF MUC can be used.