Gajim - 2024-05-06


  1. bot

    lovetox pushed 1 commits to branch gajim/master fix: Prevent message row merging if message receipt status differ - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/1387e046bb0c2820aac240416f342e48db23e781

  2. egnun

    Hey, Gajim folks, I just noticed, that your "message sent" indicator is a bit confusing.

  3. egnun

    So when I write the first message at 08:51:00, press enter, and for some reason this message doesn't get sent, Gajim – correctly – doesn't show the little tick next to the time stamp. Then I write a second message at 08:51:30, press enter again, but this message does get send, Gajim doesn't give an indicator, that it was sent. I only see this, when I open the conversation on my mobile client. Gajim also doesn't indicate very well, that this the second message is a new one.

  4. el_barto64

    hello

  5. egnun

    I am a big fan of Gajim, because for one it's the only really usable client for server admins, but the above case really is improvable. 😉️

  6. el_barto64

    where to get the link to the private chat room7

  7. lovetox

    egnun, the checkmark is not a indicator for message beeing sent, it means message was received

  8. lovetox

    and this is optional bei the receiving client, so no checkmark does not mean it was not received

  9. fjklp

    received by what? the client application or the server of the recipient?

  10. egnun

    > egnun, the checkmark is not a indicator for message beeing sent, it means message was received That's what I meant, of course.

  11. lovetox

    we dont have an indicator for single chats, if something was sent, you can assume everything is sent the second it is in the chat

  12. lovetox

    but we will improve this in future versions, for groupchat we already have the indicator if it was received by the server

  13. lovetox

    in the current development version

  14. bot

    lovetox pushed 3 commits to branch gajim/master refactor: MessageRow: Better encapsulate receipt state - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/82a8f1f3ec84317c046d2f6ab1668e1c56e4dc6b refactor: MessageRow: Make method private - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/83ec62be7090263f9bf9cc7c63a86df20dfa680f cfix: Receipts: Correctly display receipts for message corrections - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/9034f115cc4b7204a0794fed7f21ed7d5ccc3d65

  15. bot

    wurstsalat pushed 1 commits to branch gajim/master cfix: MessageActionsBox: Improve display of reply mode, correction mode, and state - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/25fde9a895a3807c136fff9b87b9d6e9c5738aea

  16. lovetox

    egnun, what exactly makes gajim usable for server admins?

  17. bot

    lovetox pushed 2 commits to branch gajim/master new: MessageActionBox: Store replies in drafts - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/3a2dc81a5f806962187734d6b94c16809ff3ee83 refactor: MessageActionBox: Make method private - https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/c9f31f31ea06437594924870f7135f008dbace05

  18. debacle

    With the current gajim master, one unit test fails: https://conference.gajim.org:5281/pastebin/55adf08b-7347-48e4-93d0-cee14b29c4e4

  19. lovetox

    and what locale do you have configured?

  20. debacle

    lovetox It's in the build process, so it should be a "neutral" one. I guess it is `C.UTF-8`.

  21. debacle

    I added an output now right before the test runs, let's see...

  22. lovetox

    yeah anyway this test is not critical functionality

  23. lovetox

    it seems its locale dependent

  24. lovetox

    its for getting the first letter from some word for the default avatar

  25. debacle

    Oh, the locale is only `C`, not `C.UTF-8`. That's not good, will try to fix it. If it is not a UTF-8 locale, then it is no surprise, that such a test fails.

  26. debacle

    Setting the locale to `C.UTF-8` explicitely does not help, so I will just disable this specific test.