Gajim - 2024-02-09


  1. ztokio

    Hello, I'm trying to send a message to a friend's email and it tells me this: Stream closed by peer: Communication with this domain is restricted (policy-violation)

  2. ztokio

    Any help or reason for this problem I have already tried everything

  3. fjklp

    You are trying to send a message from gajim to an email address? This isn't possible without using gateway that is intended for that, and I have never used one.

  4. fjklp

    How did you attempt to do this?

  5. ztokio

    Thanks for the quick response, but I'm not trying that. Shipping is to another jabber account

  6. ztokio

    bot@valid.support. Check if you turn off all antispam plugins, or have added our bot to white-list. Bot account is in OFFLINE mode, but it still send messages.

  7. freya

    hi does anyone know why the start voice/video call buttons are grayed out in a local chat with someone on the same server as mine. Im running the newest version of ejabberd, and my STUN/TURN servers are configured. So it should work. We are also both using Gajim.

  8. r00tobo

    freya, as far as I know A/V does not work with Gajim atm

  9. freya

    a darn ok. are there clients that do work?

  10. fjklp

    dino, I think

  11. freya

    ok thanks

  12. r00tobo

    freya, do you have "Use STUN server On" in your Gajim settings ?

  13. r00tobo

    I think the older A/V implementation still works with Gajim but not the newer one ?

  14. r00tobo

    I am not totally sure

  15. lady piscimisty

    Greetings

  16. lady piscimisty

    My Gajim crashed today and I think it was due to workspaces

  17. lady piscimisty

    I had to delete the `workspaces` row of the `settings` table in the `~/.config/gajim/settings.sqlite` to recover.

  18. lady piscimisty

    I should have saved the error logs but due to lack of foresight I did not

  19. lady piscimisty

    and now I don't even know why I'm in this room saying all of this

  20. cal0pteryx

    :D thanks anyways, until next time ;) I haven't seen crashes purely related to workspaces yet. Would be interesting what went wrong there

  21. fjklp

    I haven't either, and I've messed with them some trying to make weird stuff happen. I guess I need to try harder.

  22. Polarian

    https://bpa.st/36KQ What is wrong with this stanza that gajim sees the chat marker as from the group chat ("message read by <group chat name>") not from the user ("message read by <username>")

  23. meson

    https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-desktop/-/merge_requests/2030 > install a kde-mimeapps.list \o/ soon at least for Plasma 6 users there should no longer be wrong apps started for images opened from Gajim

  24. meson

    https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-desktop/-/merge_requests/2030 > install a kde-mimeapps.list \o/ soon at least for Plasma 6 users there should no longer be wrong apps starting for images opened from Gajim

  25. hook

    \o/

  26. elfchen

    🤘️

  27. elfchen

    Now if I could have that fix for Firefox starting the wrong file manager...

  28. cal0pteryx

    elfchen: it's documented on the Wiki, check the FAQ section

  29. nicoco

    > https://bpa.st/36KQ What is wrong with this stanza that gajim sees the chat marker as from the group chat ("message read by <group chat name>") not from the user ("message read by <username>") Polarian: if something's wrong it's probably with the stanza containing the read marker, not the stanza containing the message that will later be marked as read?

  30. Polarian

    >> https://bpa.st/36KQ What is wrong with this stanza that gajim sees the chat marker as from the group chat ("message read by <group chat name>") not from the user ("message read by <username>") > Polarian: if something's wrong it's probably with the stanza containing the read marker, not the stanza containing the message that will later be marked as read? nicoco: oops I sent the wrong stanza apologies

  31. Polarian

    I will get that in about 30 mins

  32. Polarian

    _don't have my laptop on me right now_

  33. nicoco

    AFAIK gajim will use XXX from <message from=XXX …> to determine "who" read the message, so from is probably room@muc-service instead of room@muc-service/the-participant, but that's just a wild guess

  34. Polarian

    > AFAIK gajim will use XXX from <message from=XXX …> to determine "who" read the message, so from is probably room@muc-service instead of room@muc-service/the-participant, but that's just a wild guess sounds like an easy mistake to make...

  35. Polarian

    your guess seems very likely :P

  36. elfchen

    > cal0pteryx: it's documented on the Wiki, check the FAQ section You mean this? https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/wikis/help/gajimfaq#gajim-opens-folderfiles-with-the-wrong-application-linux I know that and use it. But much nicer if it picks up the right defaults from Plasma 6 without myself having to fumble around in some obscure files.

  37. cal0pteryx

    Sure, if there is a way for GTK to detect this automatically, we should use it. But afaik there isn't

  38. hook

    > Now if I could have that fix for Firefox starting the wrong file manager... https://matija.suklje.name/games-consoles-and-the-meta-mystery#plasma-ify-firefox

  39. hook

    > Now if I could have that fix for Firefox starting the wrong file manager... This might help: https://matija.suklje.name/games-consoles-and-the-meta-mystery#plasma-ify-firefox

  40. fjklp

    Does anyone happen to know what part of the process makes it slow to switch chats to a chat with many occupants when the chat list is open?

  41. fjklp

    For example: is it waiting to download the list of occupants, is it the time to process the list, is it the time to render the avatars?

  42. lovetox

    neither, its worse

  43. lovetox

    yes GTK draws the list

  44. lovetox

    and it draws always the full list, even if you cannot se eit

  45. lovetox

    and it draws always the full list, even if you cannot see it

  46. lovetox

    and of course at the same time we have to load messages, load avatars etc

  47. lovetox

    but to me it feels fast enough

  48. lovetox

    i wonder also to what you compare it, show me some messenger that does it faster so i can compare

  49. fjklp

    > i wonder also to what you compare it, show me some messenger that does it faster so i can compare Fair question. I haven't been using anything else lately, but maybe I'll go testing some time.

  50. fjklp

    It's slow enough to be annoying to me in rooms with many users.

  51. fjklp

    The reason I asked is because I was trying to think if there might be ways to optimize.

  52. fjklp

    I had some vague ideas about trying to do diffs on the user list from one load to the next or something, maybe useless thoughts

  53. fjklp

    or something like caching of the product of whatever work is done, displaying that, then updating after showing the chat

  54. fjklp

    this might all be ultimately nonsense

  55. fjklp

    or, I'm the only person who cares and I'm not writing the code :)

  56. lovetox

    simply dont show it

  57. fjklp

    > and it draws always the full list, even if you cannot see it makes me wonder if we can divide this into initial rendering of roughly however many fit the screen height, then load more when you scroll down, like with chat search

  58. lovetox

    you only see the first 15 people always

  59. lovetox

    its 99,9% of time useless spacewaste you dont need

  60. lovetox

    and the 1% where you need it, open it

  61. fjklp

    I need to figure out how to add keyboard shorcuts

  62. lovetox

    > makes me wonder if we can divide this into initial rendering of roughly however many fit the screen height, then load more when you scroll down, like with chat search you can do anything, but all you just said is the job of a GUI Framework/Toolkit

  63. lovetox

    and im not in the business of inventing one

  64. fjklp

    :)

  65. lovetox

    besides, fyi in gtk4 they addressed that issue

  66. lovetox

    but sadly you trade one thing that works better for 10 other things that stop working

  67. lovetox

    so not worth it at this point

  68. fjklp

    truly sad

  69. fjklp

    > but sadly you trade one thing that works better for 10 other things that stop working is this referring to gtk4, generally?

  70. lovetox

    yes, i give them 1 or 2 years

  71. fjklp

    sounds optimistic, going by my experience as a user

  72. fjklp

    I just expect things to be broken forever

  73. fjklp

    not quite true, but it feels like it

  74. lovetox

    i think switch speed is very low on things that are important

  75. lovetox

    but maybe im just accustomed to MS Teams

  76. fjklp

    it's definitely good when the user list is closed

  77. lovetox

    so when i use Gajim, it feels very fast

  78. fjklp

    I've not used MS Teams

  79. fjklp

    I think Element renders a partial list and give the option to "load more" or something

  80. QStambaugh

    Even chats that have ~1000 people only take a couple of seconds to load up on my slowest laptop (which I'm on right now), and it's from ~2006