Gajim - 2024-02-02


  1. cal0pteryx

    chud, hitting merge wouldn't make it work. there is upstream stuff to merge. and actually reviewing the merge request, testing it etc.

  2. chud

    Idk worked for me

  3. chud

    Has anything been done in the last 4 months?

  4. chud

    Upstream stuff you mean the abandonware library farstream? They already packaged an updated version of that in the flatpak. Are we waiting for distros to pick up that fork or?...

  5. fjklp

    I can't get it to install

  6. fjklp

    I did manage to once

  7. fjklp

    not sure, flatpak is weird

  8. fjklp

    > Has anything been done in the last 4 months? https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/5951

  9. polarian

    > not sure, flatpak is weird solution: don't use flatpak

  10. polarian

    sorry unhelpful

  11. fjklp

    clearly, I'm not qualified to use it

  12. polarian

    fjklp: what distro are you using?

  13. fjklp

    ubuntu

  14. polarian

    > ubuntu oh... Ubuntu is out of date...

  15. fjklp

    on what?

  16. polarian

    gajim...

  17. fjklp

    I am using gajim nightly deb

  18. fjklp

    the flatpak I was speaking of was an experimental build that has working audio/video

  19. polarian

    https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=all&searchon=names&keywords=gajim

  20. polarian

    > I am using gajim nightly deb oh...

  21. polarian

    > the flatpak I was speaking of was an experimental build that has working audio/video ohhh....

  22. polarian

    sorry got confused

  23. chud

    >> Has anything been done in the last 4 months? > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/merge_requests/5951 >this is not yet ready for merging in the slightest. Bruh? Maybe I should just cope on with my implementation not depending on changes in gstreamer? Just bringing a library along.

  24. debacle

    cal0pteryx Remind me to show you a minor bug in Gajim before/after lunch. Maybe it's already reported.

  25. cal0pteryx

    will do ;)

  26. intelfx

    I was busy with other stuff in the last month(s), so no, not much. But that’s about to change. In either way, the gst changes look good according to their maintainer

  27. intelfx

    On the Gajim side I still want to implement xep-0353 and cleanup the rest of the Jingle state machine

  28. intelfx

    The real challenge will be getting someone to review Farstream stuff ;)

  29. backtoheaven

    Hello guys, how do I assign an admin role to a person in Gajim 1.7.3? Because I recently became one and now need to, well, give the role back to one guy

  30. ☭Mike Yellow

    Only Owners can grant Administrator.

  31. backtoheaven

    Thanks for the clue, I was thinking that the problem in is me, but thank god it isn't. Well, a bit of a sad situation, but w/e

  32. stefan

    Hello, is it possible in Gajim (1.8.4), to "link" a chat in several groups?

  33. lovetox

    not sure what you mean by link and group

  34. lovetox

    a clickable link? xmpp:gajim@conference.gajim.org?join

  35. lovetox

    you can post that to any group yes

  36. lovetox

    you can post that to any groupchat yes

  37. bodqhrohro

    Maybe merging several chats in one view?

  38. bodqhrohro

    To monitor them simultaneously.

  39. bodqhrohro

    And maybe even respond in all of them at once.

  40. speedygonzales99

    > I was busy with other stuff in the last month(s), so no, not much. But that’s about to change. In either way, the gst changes look good according to their maintainer > On the Gajim side I still want to implement xep-0353 and cleanup the rest of the Jingle state machine intelfx: I am very excited to when your PR gets merged into Gajim! 😁️

  41. intelfx

    Yep, there's quite a few moving parts to get into place. The problem is Gajim's Jingle implementation looks... generally neglected, so I'm fixing as many usability bugs as possible along the way.

  42. intelfx

    Yep, there's quite a few moving parts to get into place. The problem is Gajim's Jingle implementation looks... generally neglected, so I'm fixing as many correctness and usability bugs as possible along the way.

  43. speedygonzales99

    👍️

  44. stefan

    >> is it possible in Gajim (1.8.4), to "link" a chat in several groups? > not sure what you mean by link and group It's about the "Arbeitsbereiche" all the way to the left. I have some of them, and it would be practical, if I could link some chats to more than just one "Arbeitsbereich"

  45. cal0pteryx

    Adding the same chat to more than one workspace is not possible at the moment

  46. cal0pteryx

    (and was a design decision)

  47. stefan

    ok.

  48. stefan

    I have a problem with Omemo keys from Gajim instances on computers that I am rarely online with (only once every 4-6 weeks). Currently, for example, the key of such a rarely used machine on my main computer is displayed as inactive, although I have now brought both computers online at the same time as a test, and am trying to send myself encrypted messages via the "note to me". What can I do?

  49. stefan

    I read somewhere that a workaround could be to sync the whole gajim dir in "appdata" and work with the same profile, but this would be an extra effort with configuration and synchronisation...

  50. stefan

    (I could use a portable installation?) what is the best practice here?

  51. stefan

    it is 1.8.4

  52. lovetox

    dont sync anything

  53. lovetox

    yes you will have problems when you are only online every 6 weeks

  54. lovetox

    its baked into omemo, its a security precaution, devices will be marked as inactive

  55. lovetox

    so whats your actual problem?

  56. stefan

    I can't read many messages in "notiz an mich" on the computer I'm rarely online with. and vice versa.

  57. stefan

    that's not a huge problem now, I also have a "real" notes app, but it's always like, ouch, now I just wanted to look this up, but I can't read it.

  58. stefan

    I'm online every day, but not with all computers.

  59. stefan

    It's not only in this chat, but too in others where I chat every day .

  60. stefan

    and now, the omemo is still shown as inactive, although both computers were online at the same time for nearly an hour now.

  61. stefan

    actually, it even says, last seen: never

  62. stefan

    an now, when I activated omemo on the rarely used computer, the answer to me, was not encryptable on all 3 devices online ...

  63. stefan

    reset the omemo key on that device?

  64. stefan

    https://chat.rxmpp.de:5443/upload/5680bcb646ac9f3fe800312b92506ad84e990a48/z9ch8VmRqo53j5WDmKc4/eb44d803-2df0-4eb7-866b-35bbb58c4cf0.png

  65. stefan

    and then

  66. stefan

    there is an empty omemo devices list.

  67. stefan

    or do "geräte löschen" ?

  68. stefan

    I have a chat right now, I could do some pastes with anonymized content, if that is interesting for you. on Client A, everything is readable, on Client B not. (Diese Nachricht wurde mit OMEMO verschlüsselt und konnte nicht entschlüsselt werden.)

  69. lovetox

    as the message says you need to trust the devices

  70. lovetox

    if its empty, most likely there is a bigger problem

  71. lovetox

    which can only analysed if you send logs

  72. stefan

    switch on debug?

  73. stefan

    debug-logging?

  74. lovetox

    yes

  75. stefan

    the question is, is it worth the time (if it is interesting for you, i will take the time).

  76. stefan

    or is there a quick fix for this (e.g. delete the profile on the rarely used machine and start with a new one?)