-
seb
Hello
-
seb
On the Gajim GIT server, I got an error message on the issues list. "An error occurred while getting issue counts"
-
fjklp
seb: the server goes down pretty often but it seems to be working now
-
seb
Yep, it restart automatically
-
bot
Philipp Hörist pushed 1 commit to branch _refs/heads/master_ of _gajim_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim >: *bba4477a* < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/bba4477a261fd8d78b44ab814866817d3ca11df7 > fix: Switch phone icon to something more widely supported
-
bot
Philipp Hörist pushed 1 commit to branch _refs/heads/master_ of _gajim_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim >: *aa084013* < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/commit/aa084013064e893e57179e145ff235c34604cc4a > feat: Support multiple item dataforms Fixes #10857
-
bodqhrohro
> pidgin 3 soon umu: it's "soon" for kinda 8 years already. Why are you sure about that?
-
Kris
they actually started working on it lately
-
MSavoritias (fae,ve)
wonder if there will be a time where we actually say its ok to use pidgin
-
MSavoritias (fae,ve)
for xmpp that is
-
bodqhrohro
It's already okay and valid to use *any* XMPP client. Even such simplistic as sendxmpp.
-
Lightning Bjornsson (they, he, xe/hir)
It's always been ok to use pidgin. It's just not great
-
umu
pidgin is pretty good same with libpurple
-
Link Mauve
umu, in which ways?
-
umu
you actually dont need pidgin to use libpurple contrary to popular belief
-
umu
Link Mauve, libpurple is has a considerate design as to not be tied to just one protocol
-
Link Mauve
It’s actually quite tied to how AIM represents things.
-
umu
well it even supports icq
-
umu
which i need to use sometimes
-
Link Mauve
Its support for legacy protocols doesn’t mean it is a good library, for XMPP it is a terrible one.
-
umu
for xmpp yeah
-
umu
but
-
umu
my grandma knows how to use it because its familiar
-
Link Mauve
umu, you mean she uses libpurple to develop clients or such?
-
umu
no just the interface is easy to use for her
-
Link Mauve
Ah you mean Pidgin’s?
-
umu
ye
-
Link Mauve
You’re switching subjects here.
-
umu
wym
-
Link Mauve
We were talking about libpurple just before.
-
Link Mauve
Also, you should bring that to xmpp:devel@conference.pidgin.im?join or to an offtopic room, this is completely unrelated to Gajim.
-
Link Mauve
(I forgot to check where we were before replying.)
-
chud
Let me duplicate here: Does Gajim jingle file transfer work with conversations? For me it lets me choose the device to send it to, then begins sending, then fails. After a restart, the "send file directly" is greyed out for that contact.
-
chud
That's a on a vanilla build.
-
chud
Both on master and the archlinux package.
-
lissine
> Does Gajim jingle file transfer work with conversations? Not sure if it works. But from the xsf channel today: > hm, nothing which is jingle really works in Gajim
-
chud
yeah I just wonder how much that encompassed
-
chud
Does conversations even support it nowadays? Is it even something we want to support? Honestly my only encounter with jingle file transfer was that time I read it leaked ip addressses on tor on smth and was not encrypted whatsoever✎ -
chud
Does conversations even support it nowadays? Is it even something we want to support? Honestly my only encounter with jingle file transfer was that time I read it leaked ip addresses on tor on smth and was not encrypted whatsoever ✏
-
lissine
> and was not encrypted whatsoever Seems to not be the case for conversations, I think https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/omemo-filetransfer.html