Gajim - 2023-08-31


  1. lovetox

    Yeah that's called privacy and is not broken

  2. Menel

    As far as I know it isn't possible yet to have a _per room_ Avatar, not only in gajim but because of how the muc works. Until then it can't be changed to something nicer I guess.

  3. lovetox

    how would a per room avatar solve this?

  4. Menel

    You could set it without privacy concerns

  5. Menel

    And in that case it would be sensible for gajim to allow to configure it independently of other settings

  6. lovetox

    but why would i do that as a user?

  7. lovetox

    why would i so much care about other people seeing a avatar, that i go through the work to select a different avatar per room

  8. Menel

    Because it's nice to have an avatar. I don't know how to answer this. It is a personal matter of taste

  9. Menel

    People do it and want it 🤷

  10. Menel

    Only people that also choose different nicknames per channel I guess

  11. lissine

    > Yeah that's called privacy and is not broken yes, but it isn't obvious. Often, the Gajim user isn't aware that their avatar isn't visible in public channels. And when it is pointed out to them they often don't know they can fix it by changing this setting. Perhaps there should be a dialogue box about it when a user joins a public channel for the first time, allowing them to choose.

  12. lovenetworkdependenttools

    > why To make everyone know you're a weeb lol.

  13. sdjlbmrt

    Hello

  14. Anon

    Hey everyone I've got a problem

  15. Anon

    Seems like I can't connect to calyxinstitute jabber

  16. Anon

    https://creep.im:5443/upload/bd6748a0efe1e71f02349ba3785736cf873e4b11/UHz1tq3IkgazmdNIpDExgjRaok49AdXBVorHu2Zr/eb45ee4b-1ea7-48eb-9fca-5bf33d1d69b5.png

  17. Menel

    Anon: what did you exactly do and what do you mean? Can't login to an account you have there? Or something else?

  18. Anon

    > Anon: what did you exactly do and what do you mean? > Can't login to an account you have there? Or something else? I have an account there

  19. meson

    Anon, there's no official OTR plugin for Gajim since v1.0, isn't there? > The server forces you to use Off-The-Record Messaging Source: https://calyxinstitute.org/projects/digital-services/xmpp

  20. meson

    Anon, there's no official OTR plugin for Gajim since v1.0, is there? > The server forces you to use Off-The-Record Messaging Source: https://calyxinstitute.org/projects/digital-services/xmpp

  21. meson

    I'd look for a different provider probably.

  22. ann

    there was unofficial OTR plugin for Gajim 1.7+, since 1.8 Gajim no more supports third party encryption plugins afaik.

  23. ann

    dev.narayana.im/bodqhrohro/gajim-otrplugin

  24. ann

    https://dev.narayana.im/bodqhrohro/gajim-otrplugin/src/branch/dev-1.4plus *

  25. ann

    bodqhrohro: hru

  26. lovetox

    Anon, seems your password is wrong or the server broke it somehow

  27. lovetox

    you probably need to reset it or talk to the server admin

  28. lovetox

    on what gajim version are you?

  29. Anon

    lovetox: I'm on 1.8

  30. lovetox

    yeah the message basically means server is not happy with your password

  31. lovenetworkdependenttools

    ann: I can't even run 1.8 from source yet lol. And even though the explicit encryption hooks might be broken, I suppose generic send/display hooks may be added to the codebase, they would be useful for many things.

  32. meson

    I see, the calyx server seems to be happy if any encryption like OTR, OMEMO or GPG is used.

  33. erik

    hi. Just checked the list of supported XEPs. [XEP-0201](https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0201.html) isn't on it. Not many clients actually support message threads, but many other networks seem to do so (Slack, Matrix, others too) and so do their bridges. For the best bridge experience, it'd be nice if the XMPP client would support it.

  34. lovetox

    the chances of this happening are near zero

  35. lovetox

    its simply too much work

  36. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    Cheogram supports it

  37. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    Dont know of other clients though

  38. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    Yeah gajim doesnt

  39. erik

    cheogram? never heard of it.

  40. erik

    ok. I understand that it's too much work, especially when no other clients support it.

  41. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    > cheogram? never heard of it. Its android

  42. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    But yeah other priorities right now probably

  43. MSavoritias (fae,ve)

    For gajim

  44. erik

    yep. Understood. Thanks!

  45. lovenetworkdependenttools

    erik: best Conversations fork, I suppose.

  46. lovenetworkdependenttools

    Might be very resource-hungry sometimes though.

  47. lovenetworkdependenttools

    They added a lot of features.