Gajim - 2023-07-28


  1. kurion

    Please correct me if I'm wrong, I figure, the only way to see a contact's status message is to hover on the contact in the roster of an AccountPage.

  2. lovetox

    Veronica (XMPP): don't deactivate use system keyring

  3. kurion

    I think I Just found out an unusual behaviour. When I remove a contact from a roster, it doesn't show up on the roster anymore (as expected) but the number in the [Contacts n/n] label above the roster doesn't change.

  4. kurion

    When I had 3 contacts, it was Contacts (3/3). But after removing one of the contacts, it still shows Contacts (3/3).

  5. kurion

    And the client of the removed contact shows that only the authorization was removed. And my account still appears in the contact list of the removed contact's client.

  6. kurion

    But with my account's status set to Offline.

  7. kurion

    My account and the removed contact still can send/receive messages.

  8. kurion

    Should I make an issue?

  9. kurion

    Then I added the contact back again and added authorization and all that.

  10. kurion

    I went to the contact's client (in this case, Psi+). From there I removed my account from the contact list of my contact.

  11. kurion

    And I was surprised to see that the my contact still shows up in the contact list of my account in Gajim.

  12. kurion

    But my account didn't show up anymore in my contact's roster in Psi+

  13. cal0pteryx

    kurion: you can't force others to remove yourself from their contact list

  14. cal0pteryx

    Only thing you can do is remove subscription. Then they'll stop seeing your online status

  15. cal0pteryx

    If you want to block someone, you can do that additionally to removing them from your contact list

  16. kurion

    Oh, I see. I was wrong to have thought this was a both way thing.

  17. kurion

    Oh, I see. I was wrong to have thought this removing contact was a both way thing.

  18. kurion

    thanks for the clarification.

  19. kurion

    What about the Contacts (n/n) label not changing after I remove a contact from my roster?

  20. cal0pteryx

    kurion: on gajim 1.8.0?

  21. kurion

    yes.

  22. cal0pteryx

    That seems to be a bug

  23. kurion

    I made some changes here and there but not anything related to the roster treeview except the Menu button thing.

  24. cal0pteryx

    Just open an issue, I'll check later :)

  25. kurion

    Will do

  26. kurion

    Just wanted a quick yes/no. Does that changing that Contacts label involve requesting something from the XMPP server or using the nbxmpp module?

  27. kurion

    Just wanted a quick yes/no. Does changing that Contacts label involve requesting something from the XMPP server or using the nbxmpp module?

  28. cal0pteryx

    Your contact names are synchronized with the server

  29. kurion

    I see.

  30. kurion

    Another UX improvement I wanted to draw attention to: To set/change a contact's nickname one has to 1. go to the his accounts AccountPage 2. go to the contact's Details page through the roster context menu 3. click on Settings tab there. 4. click the pencil icon to edit the nickname.

  31. kurion

    I think we could make it easier on the user to change a nickname of his contacts. Because people choose all sorts of peculiar jids and giving them a easy to recognize nick is a feature that many people need to make heavy use of.

  32. kurion

    I think we could make it easier on the user to change nicks of his contacts. Because people choose all sorts of peculiar jids and giving them a easy to recognize nick is a feature that many people need to make heavy use of.

  33. kurion

    What do you guys think?

  34. kurion

    Like if we could press F2 (which a common renamer key on file explorer applications) on a contact in the roster to edit its nick in place, it'd be great.

  35. kurion

    Like if we could press F2 (which is a common renamer key on file explorer applications) on a contact in the roster to edit its nick in place, it'd be great.

  36. kurion

    Or at least provide a context menu for changing the nick.

  37. cal0pteryx

    kurion: in each chat, there is an info button at the top. This leads you directly to the contact's details dialog

  38. lovetox

    kurion: we don't want to move more functionality to the roster. We already hide it from the standard view

  39. lovetox

    Other messengers don't have a way at all to look at the roster

  40. lovetox

    All actions should be available from the chat view

  41. lovetox

    And renaming contacts is not as common as you think

  42. lovetox

    As people can set their own nickname which they usually do

  43. opal

    dont call me babe.

  44. opal

    >Other messengers don't have a way at all to look at the roster 2020s really took instant messaging by storm >.>

  45. Deide

    Rosters are mainly useful for presence and presence is part of the acronym of XMPP. Ironically, despite that, other messengers tend to do it better.

  46. Deide

    Discord has its 'Rich Presence' with interactivity. And Steam has its focused gaming presence which is useful for watching or joining games.

  47. aquatarkus

    focused gaming presence, how does it work?

  48. aquatarkus

    I don't use steam

  49. Veronica

    steam is spyware

  50. aquatarkus

    btw Deide, you can set custom status messages on xmpp

  51. Deide

    As in you can see what games your friends are playing - to varying details. ie. "Ben is attacking a horde of goblins in Goblin Hunter level 2"

  52. aquatarkus

    you can script it to set that to whatever program has focus if you wanted to

  53. Deide

    Yes you can.

  54. aquatarkus

    shouldn't be too difficult I think

  55. Deide

    But if the Roster is more and more hidden away, it's information you're only likely to see during an active conversation. My point was that the messengers that do still have prominent rosters mainly do so for the sake of presence.

  56. aquatarkus

    it's not hidden away tho is it

  57. Deide

    > we don't want to move more functionality to the roster. We already hide it from the standard view > Other messengers don't have a way at all to look at the roster Sorry, I'm mainly replying to this

  58. aquatarkus

    I see

  59. lovetox

    we show presence in the conversation list

  60. lovetox

    and we could show the status message simply in the chat banner

  61. lovetox

    but its simply not used often, you cant compare it to steam, steam does this automatically, and it can display funny or useful things

  62. lovetox

    as a xmpp client, i can show if you are away when you set a auto away message

  63. lovetox

    but thats about it, i think people would not find it *nice* if a xmpp client begins to monitors every action and broadcasts it to the world

  64. lovetox

    User X is looking at pornhub.com

  65. kurion

    if I'm not wrong, the only way to see the contact's status message is to hover over it in the roster, right

  66. kurion

    if I'm not wrong, the only way to see the contact's status message is to hover over it in the roster, right?

  67. aquatarkus

    > but thats about it, i think people would not find it *nice* if a xmpp client begins to monitors every action and broadcasts it to the world that's true, even having the feature would be seen badly in free software communities

  68. aquatarkus

    it's a 'sus' feature

  69. kurion

    A list containing all the contacts, icon to show if they are online/offline/away, their current status message is what would be a great roster in my opinion

  70. aquatarkus

    it can be cool if you script it yourself tho

  71. kurion

    What do you guys think of the roster in Psi+ ?

  72. aquatarkus

    lovetox: a cool way to do this would be to allow you to set your status to update based on the output of some shell command

  73. aquatarkus

    maybe make automation/scripting a little easier

  74. lovetox

    kurion, we are discussing the need for a roster

  75. lovetox

    yeah if you want to do a roster, psi+ is certainly great

  76. lovetox

    but we dont want to need a roster

  77. lovetox

    and i know only one reason someone needs roster

  78. Deide

    > and it can display funny or useful things Yeah, exactly! Useful presence is nice. I'd just think that the Messaging and _Presence_ Protocol might be geared towards that.

  79. lovetox

    and thats a business usecase, where you want a look who from a certain group is online

  80. aquatarkus

    > if I'm not wrong, the only way to see the contact's status message is to hover over it in the roster, right? if that is so then it's not great

  81. aquatarkus

    > and thats a business usecase, where you want a look who from a certain group is online or maybe you have many friends on xmpp and want to check who is available for a chat..?

  82. lovetox

    this is not common sorry

  83. aquatarkus

    yeah, unfortunately

  84. aquatarkus

    xmpp isn't very popular

  85. lovetox

    in privat env, you know exactly who you want to talk to

  86. Deide

    As uncommon as xmpp to be sure

  87. lovetox

    not looking in a list of 10 people, and then deciding based on status who you write

  88. lovetox

    in todays times, you write your message anyway

  89. lovetox

    the status does not matter

  90. aquatarkus

    > in privat env, you know exactly who you want to talk to not sure what you mean by a private env

  91. aquatarkus

    > in todays times, you write your message anyway personally I think that's not good

  92. lovetox

    why would it not be good?

  93. aquatarkus

    and I dislike how popular messaging apps hide presence these days

  94. lovetox

    why would i care what status you have, if i want to send you a message

  95. lovetox

    thats what messengers are for

  96. aquatarkus

    on whatsapp, I don't want to message someone if they are busy

  97. lovetox

    why not?

  98. aquatarkus

    or just not available

  99. aquatarkus

    because I want to talk with them now

  100. aquatarkus

    that's what presence is for

  101. aquatarkus

    if I'm green bubble, I'm available for a chat

  102. aquatarkus

    if it's red, then that means I'm busy

  103. lovetox

    !? you write only people if you believe you get an immediate answer?

  104. aquatarkus

    no, because modern chat apps forced me to just DM them whenever

  105. lovetox

    and even if the status is green, that does not mean at all that you get an answer

  106. lovetox

    it has simply nothing to do with it

  107. lovetox

    only because im green, does not mean i want to talk to you

  108. aquatarkus

    on the MSN days, DMing someone who had the red status was just not polite tho

  109. Deide

    I can see that being the case if you have a selection of people to choose from. Maybe you want to have a conversation for 10 - 20 minutes instead of having something very particular and asynchronous to relay.

  110. aquatarkus

    I only started using xmpp recently, but I did use old messengers where presence was a big thing

  111. lovetox

    its irrelevant, a client that is set to busy, will not notify you about new messages

  112. lovetox

    thats what busy means

  113. lovetox

    dont notify me, i have other things to do

  114. lovetox

    so i couldnt care less if 100 people message me while im busy

  115. Deide

    Why broadcast the status at all then?

  116. lovetox

    i will not notice it anyway

  117. aquatarkus

    if I'm talking to friends, I would rather talk to them when they are already "available" beecause it's more likely for them to be available

  118. aquatarkus

    even if it's not 100%

  119. aquatarkus

    ofc they could have just forgotten

  120. lovetox

    status i nice, to know if someone is available, or busy (not likely he will answer), or offline

  121. aquatarkus

    but back in my day we would set it to busy/away when going afk

  122. lovetox

    im not arguing that we dont need status, im arguing you dont need a list of 100 people visible to see all of there status

  123. lovetox

    you want to talk to someone, you open a chat

  124. lovetox

    see the status and make your conclusion

  125. aquatarkus

    > im not arguing that we dont need status, im arguing you dont need a list of 100 people visible to see all of there status it's more relevant if you have a lot of people you talk to on xmpp

  126. aquatarkus

    sometimes I just want to talk to anyone about random crap

  127. aquatarkus

    and I don't want to bother them if they are busy

  128. aquatarkus

    like, sure it's not "needed" but it's easier to have a list

  129. ☭Mike Yellow

    There is an online status called “free for chat” in standard.

  130. kurion

    How about we can see the status message of contacts along with already available info in the Start/Join Chat dialog?

  131. aquatarkus

    I think the current contacts list is fine tho

  132. kurion

    I mean the status message is useful piece of info. Why put it in a place that is purposefully hidden (kind of)

  133. kurion

    I mean the status message is useful piece of info. Why put it in a place that is purposefully hidden (kind of)?

  134. aquatarkus

    > I mean the status message is useful piece of info. Why put it in a place that is purposefully hidden (kind of)? yeah, I see no reason to hide it personally

  135. aquatarkus

    not that it's a big deal

  136. lovetox

    just so you dont misunderstand me, i see no problem with status, or status message, all useful no discussion

  137. lovetox

    But you think the perfect place for this info is the roster

  138. lovetox

    and thats what im trying to tell you, the roster will not be a central part of the UX of Gajim

  139. lovetox

    it will always be there, but always hidden, under one or two clicks

  140. lovetox

    so if you really find this information so useful, think about placing it somewhere where people see it easily and dont need to go to the roster

  141. kurion

    Is Start/Join Chat a good place for this?

  142. lovetox

    status is already there, of course we can display the status message also

  143. lovetox

    where do other messengers place this info?

  144. kurion

    Psi+ has it in the roster

  145. aquatarkus

    > it will always be there, but always hidden, under one or two clicks this is fine

  146. kurion

    roster is a central part of UX i Psi+

  147. kurion

    roster is a central part of UX in Psi+

  148. aquatarkus

    would be nice to have a CLI argument to start gajim at the roster/contacts list page tho

  149. aquatarkus

    for convenience

  150. lovetox

    yes, Psi+ is a 90 style chat client, it makes no sense to look at them for UX

  151. aquatarkus

    btw I just realized that you can toggle the chat list. Pretty cool feature.

  152. lovetox

    for example we display the status message in the group chat roster

  153. lovetox

    look here in the Gajim chat

  154. lovetox

    10 people from 200 have a status message set

  155. lovetox

    and its the automatic one that Gajim sets when you are not available

  156. lovetox

    status message is more important in the business setting

  157. lovetox

    where you communicate holidays, or who to contact in case of emergency or something like that

  158. kurion

    Just to be clear, I am not saying that we should take UX lessons from Psi+.

  159. kurion

    But apart from their inbox UI, do you think the concept of having the roster as a central part of UX is a 90s only thing?

  160. aquatarkus

    is there a way to hide the workspace bar in gajim?

  161. kurion

    Design of every messenger is opinionated, not going to battle that.

  162. lovetox

    kurion, yes

  163. lovetox

    there is no messenger in the last 10 years that features a roster as main point of the ux to my knowledge

  164. aquatarkus

    I think it would be nice if options to hide both the workspace and chat bars were available from the menu bar under "View"

  165. aquatarkus

    I think it would be nice if options to hide both the workspace and chat list bars were available from the menu bar under "View"

  166. aquatarkus

    the "view" menu currently only has two options

  167. aquatarkus

    btw is it okay to make these feature requests here? I don't want to be inconvenient

  168. kurion

    Could there be some kind of poll at gajim.org to survey how users are liking the new layout?

  169. kurion

    or what parts of the old and new layout they like or find useful.

  170. lovetox

    i rather have a poll about what features users want to see

  171. kurion

    That would be nice too.

  172. lovetox

    aquatarkus, yes this room is for discussing Gajim

  173. kurion

    I think it will be very interesting to see the results of the layout vs layout poll as no layout is likely to have a landslide victory.

  174. lovetox

    there is no reason to do such a poll, because there is no action for us that follows it

  175. lovetox

    a user that loves 90 style chat messengers, has multiple options he can use

  176. kurion

    at least the _mega_ contact list and the multi window layout was very useful, imo

  177. lovetox

    everything is useful to someone

  178. kurion

    this issue is an interesting read https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/issues/11531

  179. Veronica[m]

    i love proprietary software

  180. aquatarkus

    alright, another small suggestion that I would have is to replace the "Gajim" menu bar entry with "Main" or something along these lines

  181. aquatarkus

    because Gajim is already the window menu/title of the program. It looks weird to have a menu bar entry that is the same title of the window, at least in my opinion

  182. aquatarkus

    > this issue is an interesting read > https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/issues/11531 I share their opinion on 1). I like to make the Gajim window very small to chat with friends when I'm party watching a show with them

  183. aquatarkus

    I think being able to hide parts of the UI like the workspace view would help with this

  184. aquatarkus

    I have a 1366x768 resolution

  185. lovetox

    https://share.hoerist.com/philipp/2MlK35JVSe5R6jG4/51777cfc-8802-49f7-805e-9bd6d5354035.png

  186. lovetox

    looks small enough for me

  187. lovetox

    but that depends on your screen size

  188. aquatarkus

    this is the smallest that I can make it

  189. lovetox

    and yes if you have low resolution, everything will be bigger

  190. aquatarkus

    https://sure.im:443/upload/08366416-aca1-4e08-a4a3-5655ffc4dcf2/b0bcec07-d50a-4e5a-91de-bf39bc22ad4f.png

  191. aquatarkus

    if I were to make it smaller, stuff would start to be cut

  192. aquatarkus

    now after I opened and closed a window, stuff started cutting earlier

  193. aquatarkus

    https://sure.im:443/upload/220c3011-85c1-4613-acdb-8b98f8ae5309/20c5cd03-cce6-4f87-9efd-b740d71272f0.png

  194. lovetox

    so what about some kind of single chat focus mode

  195. lovetox

    that removes the banner, and the left sidebar

  196. lovetox

    so it would only display the chat text anymore

  197. aquatarkus

    yeah, that would be great

  198. aquatarkus

    but just the ability to hide the workspace bar would be good already

  199. lovetox

    sounds to complex to me

  200. lovetox

    one shortcut to hide the conv list

  201. lovetox

    a second one to hide the bar

  202. lovetox

    its obvious that you dont want to use the application constantly in this state

  203. aquatarkus

    yeah

  204. lovetox

    so why not find out what it is that you actually want, and provide one shortcut who gets you there

  205. lovetox

    i can understand the use case, to chat only with one person and want to have the window small to do something on the side

  206. lovetox

    lets call it "Focus Mode"

  207. aquatarkus

    I think being able to hide the workspace bar has another usecase tho, some people barely use the workspaces feature. I like it personally, but some additional customization settings can't hurt unless they are harder to implement I think.

  208. aquatarkus

    It would be also nice if you could switch to the Roster page and the main status page with the "View" menu from the menu bar

  209. lovetox

    not using workspaces is no reason to hide them, you dont need to click there

  210. lovetox

    and disabling workspaces does not allow to remove the sidebar

  211. lovetox

    as it has multiple other uses

  212. lovetox

    i think if people say "i dont use workspaces" they mean, make the sidebar go away

  213. aquatarkus

    > as it has multiple other uses yeah, you can switch to the status and roster pages

  214. lovetox

    but there is the profile button on the left bottom side, and the Gajim button at the top

  215. aquatarkus

    aside from workspaces, these are the two other functionalities of it

  216. lovetox

    and both have uses

  217. aquatarkus

    I think these could be added to the view menu tho

  218. aquatarkus

    so that people can choose to not use the sidebar

  219. lovetox

    hm both can also show notifications

  220. lovetox

    and we need a place where we can notify the user about non-chat related stuff

  221. aquatarkus

    > and we need a place where we can notify the user about non-chat related stuff like what? I'm new to XMPP, never saw notifications there

  222. lovetox

    We could try and move the buttons into the cat list

  223. lovetox

    when someone sends you a groupchat invitation, or want to add you to his roster for example

  224. lovetox

    in the future we might warn the users with notification there, that something does not work on his server

  225. aquatarkus

    where can I find an example screenshot? I never got either

  226. lovetox

    tell someone to send you a groupchat invite

  227. aquatarkus

    can someone send me a groupchat invite? I don't have any friends online

  228. aquatarkus

    :x

  229. lovetox

    but you need a roster for your many friends right :D

  230. aquatarkus

    once I convert everyone to XMPP, that is

  231. aquatarkus

    it's no easy task

  232. lovetox

    i send you an invite

  233. aquatarkus

    thanks, I see it

  234. lovetox

    kurion, i just remembered if your chat switching is slow, what also helps is closing the groupchat roster

  235. lovetox

    it increases performance very much

  236. kurion

    Thanks. But I barely have a groupchat.

  237. aquatarkus

    lovetox: I think workspace switching could also be added to the view menu. View -> Workspaces... -> (list)

  238. lovetox

    no because the workspace shows notifications

  239. lovetox

    how many unreadmessages you have, how would you even know that there are messages waiting

  240. aquatarkus

    true

  241. lovetox

    if someone wants to use workspaces, the bar needs to be there

  242. lovetox

    if not the problem is the profile button and the app button

  243. lovetox

    i can see getting rid of the app page altogether

  244. lovetox

    and maybe we can move the profile button into the chat list bottom

  245. EmleyMoor

    I am loving the workspaces

  246. lovetox

    EmleyMoor, great to hear :)

  247. aquatarkus

    the app page is mainly useful to check for plugin/gajim updates, maybe move this to the about page?

  248. aquatarkus

    Help -> About

  249. lovetox

    it can set currently a status for *all* accounts

  250. kurion

    Global status is quite useful

  251. aquatarkus

    > it can set currently a status for *all* accounts true, I missed that because I only have one account

  252. kurion

    It is my earnest request to the devs to consider putting up a user survey to see what features the Gajim userbase want. But I think ensuring organic response might be hard.

  253. lovetox

    kurion, we are talking about making Gajim able to be smaller

  254. lovetox

    this is a very often requested topic

  255. lovetox

    its not that we dont want to do it, but its not that easy, a lot of things have to be solved

  256. kurion

    Yes, definitely

  257. aquatarkus

    another thing to consider in regards to notifications is that most people have system notifications

  258. aquatarkus

    in windows, a (1) would display in the taskbar icon when you have unread chats or other notifications, wouldn't it?

  259. aquatarkus

    or it would show up on the tray

  260. aquatarkus

    also lovetox, would it really be impossible to display notifications in the menu bar? I vaguely remember some program where they displayed a status directly on the menu bar

  261. lovetox

    notifications in the menu bar? never seen that in any application

  262. lovetox

    no system notifications is just to make you notice something

  263. lovetox

    but the same thing needs to be visible in gajim also

  264. lovetox

    just think we would only send system notifications

  265. lovetox

    but would not show you in Gajim which chat has unread messages

  266. lovetox

    because we already told you with a notification

  267. lovetox

    Especially in Linux env you can not assume people have installed demons that can persist notifications

  268. aquatarkus

    > notifications in the menu bar? never seen that in any application I'm thinking more about dynamically changing menu entries. I have seen a FPS counter before for instance

  269. aquatarkus

    You could display workspace unread chat notifications in the menu bar along with the name of the chat

  270. aquatarkus

    View -> Workspaces... -> [3] Groups / [2] People Like this

  271. aquatarkus

    the [number] would indicate the amount of unread messages per workspace

  272. aquatarkus

    the downside is that it's not on your face (for a notification, it's a downside I guess), but I think it would still serve the intended purpose of letting you know that you have unread messages

  273. lovetox

    as said you focus on the wrong thing

  274. lovetox

    making the workspace icon disappear does not make the sidebar disappear

  275. lovetox

    i doubt that someone who actively uses workspaces, has a big problem with the sidebar

  276. lovetox

    i assume its only the people that have no use for it, want it goine

  277. lovetox

    i assume its only the people that have no use for it, want it gone

  278. lovetox

    the harder question is, where the other functionalities of the sidebar should move

  279. aquatarkus

    I'm suggesting this under the assumption that you would want to move the profile icon to the chat bar in order to make the workspace bar toggleable

  280. lovetox

    if you can toggle it, why would we move stuff to a menu?

  281. lovetox

    then you simply can toggle it if you are interested in the information or need to use it

  282. aquatarkus

    because then you can access that stuff even when you toggle the bar off

  283. aquatarkus

    and people can choose the UI that they prefer

  284. aquatarkus

    whether it's the bar or accessing it via the menu bar

  285. aquatarkus

    doing it via the menu bar saves up on space

  286. lovetox

    and how do you select a chat after switching to the workspace?

  287. lovetox

    how do you see which chat has notifications?

  288. aquatarkus

    via the chat bar

  289. aquatarkus

    the chat list

  290. lovetox

    that makes no sense, either you want the window small then everything is hidden

  291. lovetox

    or not then it does not matter if there are 40 px sidebar

  292. lovetox

    nobody uses a menu to save 40 px on the screen

  293. aquatarkus

    depends

  294. aquatarkus

    if I only use gajim maximized then I wouldn't

  295. aquatarkus

    but if I wanted it open while I'm doing other stuff, then I would want to reduce the size of unnecessary stuff as much as I can

  296. lovetox

    its not unnecessary

  297. aquatarkus

    the chat list is necessary, workspace bar isn't

  298. lovetox

    you actively use it and need the information

  299. lovetox

    meh i dont see it really, we are not in a game to save every pixel

  300. lovetox

    i can understand someone that says i want a very small window and chat to a single person, i dont need all the other information for a amout of time

  301. lovetox

    i cant emphasize with the argument, i need Gajim to be 40px smaller

  302. aquatarkus

    it depends on I'm doing and how much space is required for other activities

  303. aquatarkus

    for the previous example, in party watching I would want it as small as possible

  304. aquatarkus

    but if I wanted to have LibreOffice Writer or Emacs open while I do work and have a chat on the side, then I wouldn't mind some additional clutter on the side, I wouldn't need it to be that small but a full-sized gajim window is still too big

  305. aquatarkus

    but yeah it's minor, if you could just add 'focus mode' that would already be very awesome

  306. aquatarkus

    > I wouldn't need it to be that small but a full-sized gajim window is still too big just to complete, I think the chat list is way more important than the workspace bar for the general usability of the client

  307. aquatarkus

    would also be nice if it could be shrank further than it is currently possible, in a way that the message preview would be hidden, and only the avatar and the number of unreads would be displayed

  308. aquatarkus

    (this is again very minor)

  309. lovetox

    yes this would possible i guess if we do notification badges as overlay over the avatar

  310. lovetox

    https://share.hoerist.com/philipp/vc6O5kT1nqaDup5k/Screenshot_from_2023-07-28_22-24-48.png

  311. lovetox

    like this maybe

  312. aquatarkus

    perfect

  313. aquatarkus

    also lovetox, would it be possible to allow further shrinking of the window before UI elements start to get cut off?

  314. lovetox

    yeah we have to look into it, its not intentional, i dont know what is causing this, i think somewhere is a minimal size defined

  315. aquatarkus

    thank you :)

  316. lovetox

    i added a feature request for the focus mode, and if we work on that then its logical to look into the min size stuff also

  317. lovetox

    https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/-/issues/11587

  318. Novice8

    Hello. Is there some kind of auto-complete in Gajim. I cannot type "op" without Gajim changing it to "original poster". How could I turn this off? (Manjaro Linux, Gajim 1.8.0.) Thanks.

  319. opal

    might be gspell/hunspell doing that? i dont recall any such autoreplace in gajim itself

  320. opal

    but also i dont have any *spell packages on my system cus i dont use spellcheck at all