Gajim - 2023-07-18


  1. fungus

    btw just in case anyone else decides they want to work on it I prob wont be working on the latex plugin (I found it more useful just to render latex in some other program, since that works for all the applications I want to use, not just gajim)

  2. cal0pteryx

    fungus: thanks for the feedback

  3. aquatarkus

    hi, I have a (probably) stupid question: would logging in over Tor (with the advanced settings/account settings proxy toggle), and then enabling the global Tor proxy, create a Tor-over-Tor scenario..?

  4. aquatarkus

    is it safe to have both options simultaneously enabled?

  5. lovetox

    Yes

  6. lovetox

    It's just that there are operations which are not bound to an account

  7. lovetox

    And for that there is the global proxy

  8. Mx2

    why was gajim actually written in python?

  9. kurion

    So if I have Global Proxy set to TOR and don't tick the Advanced Settings for an account, will that account use TOR to log in and chatting?

  10. kurion

    So if I have Global Proxy set to TOR and don't tick the Advanced Settings for an account, will that account use TOR to log in and chat?

  11. aquatarkus

    cool, ty

  12. kurion

    lovetox: You previously answered "Yes" aquatarkus's question. Which question did your answer address? 'TOR-over-TOR' one or 'Is it safe' one?

  13. kurion

    I am trying to understand the behavior of Global proxy,

  14. lovetox

    The second

  15. mjk

    tor-over-tor is pretty safe as well, if I remember correctly and *if* allowed by the exit node (which is highly unusual), just hella slow

  16. kurion

    lovetox: Thanks

  17. kurion

    If I have Global Proxy set to TOR and don't tick the Advanced Settings for an account, will that account use TOR to log in and chat?

  18. lovetox

    yes

  19. firepenguin

    mjk: Tor-over-Tor is **NOT SAFE** at all: https://old.reddit.com/r/TOR/comments/mlqdxo/gtn0lxh/ https://old.reddittorjg6rue252oqsxryoxengawnmo46qy4kyii5wtqnwfj4ooad.onion/r/TOR/comments/mlqdxo/gtn0lxh/ https://tor.stackexchange.com/q/427/

  20. kurion

    lovetox: Thanks for the clarification

  21. mjk

    firepenguin: okay, those seem to cover the case of a tor daemon connecting to the internet via a tor circuit. in retrospect, *that* is the scenario that should be called "tor-over-tor", not what I believe was being discussed here and to what I replied, namely, Gajim connecting to 127.0.0.1:9050 through a tor circuit

  22. mjk

    firepenguin: okay, those seem to cover the case of a tor daemon connecting to the internet via a tor circuit. in retrospect, *that* is the scenario that should be called "tor-over-tor", not what I believe was being discussed here and to what I replied, namely, Gajim connecting to socks5://127.0.0.1:9050 through a tor circuit

  23. mjk

    the latter is what happens when you run, say, `torsocks gajim` and use the Tor proxy preset within Gajim

  24. Hiker

    Gajim tells me that the Prosody server has a certification error and it doesn't connect. But the cert is valid until August 15 and Conversations doesn't give that message.

  25. hannibal

    Hiker: does the cert cover the domain you are using?

  26. Hiker

    hannibal: Yes.

  27. lovetox

    Gajim usually tells you what the error is

  28. Hiker

    lovetox: undefined error

  29. lovetox

    hm do you run a webserver on the main domain?

  30. mjk

    and what's the Gajim version

  31. Hiker

    mjk: v1.8.0 on windows

  32. Hiker

    lovetox: yes

  33. mjk

    mayhaps that windows installation doesn't have the necessary certs? just poking at guesses

  34. Hiker

    I renewed the certificates and restarted the Prosody server - and Gajim connects without any error message... Bit strange but it works ;-)

  35. cal0pteryx

    Seems you didn't give prosody your latest certs ;)

  36. Hiker

    The certs are valid until mid August. Gajim itself couldn't tell us which problem it found with "unknown error".

  37. cal0pteryx

    Since restarting the server helped, it seems that something was wrong there

  38. mjk

    "unknown error" is a bug in and of itself, I'd say. in glib or wherever

  39. mjk

    no good errors should go unpunished!