-
fungus
btw just in case anyone else decides they want to work on it I prob wont be working on the latex plugin (I found it more useful just to render latex in some other program, since that works for all the applications I want to use, not just gajim)
-
cal0pteryx
fungus: thanks for the feedback
-
aquatarkus
hi, I have a (probably) stupid question: would logging in over Tor (with the advanced settings/account settings proxy toggle), and then enabling the global Tor proxy, create a Tor-over-Tor scenario..?
-
aquatarkus
is it safe to have both options simultaneously enabled?
-
lovetox
Yes
-
lovetox
It's just that there are operations which are not bound to an account
-
lovetox
And for that there is the global proxy
-
Mx2
why was gajim actually written in python?
-
kurion
So if I have Global Proxy set to TOR and don't tick the Advanced Settings for an account, will that account use TOR to log in and chatting?✎ -
kurion
So if I have Global Proxy set to TOR and don't tick the Advanced Settings for an account, will that account use TOR to log in and chat? ✏
-
aquatarkus
cool, ty
-
kurion
lovetox: You previously answered "Yes" aquatarkus's question. Which question did your answer address? 'TOR-over-TOR' one or 'Is it safe' one?
-
kurion
I am trying to understand the behavior of Global proxy,
-
lovetox
The second
-
mjk
tor-over-tor is pretty safe as well, if I remember correctly and *if* allowed by the exit node (which is highly unusual), just hella slow
-
kurion
lovetox: Thanks
-
kurion
If I have Global Proxy set to TOR and don't tick the Advanced Settings for an account, will that account use TOR to log in and chat?
-
lovetox
yes
-
firepenguin
mjk: Tor-over-Tor is **NOT SAFE** at all: https://old.reddit.com/r/TOR/comments/mlqdxo/gtn0lxh/ https://old.reddittorjg6rue252oqsxryoxengawnmo46qy4kyii5wtqnwfj4ooad.onion/r/TOR/comments/mlqdxo/gtn0lxh/ https://tor.stackexchange.com/q/427/
-
kurion
lovetox: Thanks for the clarification
-
mjk
firepenguin: okay, those seem to cover the case of a tor daemon connecting to the internet via a tor circuit. in retrospect, *that* is the scenario that should be called "tor-over-tor", not what I believe was being discussed here and to what I replied, namely, Gajim connecting to 127.0.0.1:9050 through a tor circuit✎ -
mjk
firepenguin: okay, those seem to cover the case of a tor daemon connecting to the internet via a tor circuit. in retrospect, *that* is the scenario that should be called "tor-over-tor", not what I believe was being discussed here and to what I replied, namely, Gajim connecting to socks5://127.0.0.1:9050 through a tor circuit ✏
-
mjk
the latter is what happens when you run, say, `torsocks gajim` and use the Tor proxy preset within Gajim
-
Hiker
Gajim tells me that the Prosody server has a certification error and it doesn't connect. But the cert is valid until August 15 and Conversations doesn't give that message.
-
hannibal
Hiker: does the cert cover the domain you are using?
-
Hiker
hannibal: Yes.
-
lovetox
Gajim usually tells you what the error is
-
Hiker
lovetox: undefined error
-
lovetox
hm do you run a webserver on the main domain?
-
mjk
and what's the Gajim version
-
Hiker
mjk: v1.8.0 on windows
-
Hiker
lovetox: yes
-
mjk
mayhaps that windows installation doesn't have the necessary certs? just poking at guesses
-
Hiker
I renewed the certificates and restarted the Prosody server - and Gajim connects without any error message... Bit strange but it works ;-)
-
cal0pteryx
Seems you didn't give prosody your latest certs ;)
-
Hiker
The certs are valid until mid August. Gajim itself couldn't tell us which problem it found with "unknown error".
-
cal0pteryx
Since restarting the server helped, it seems that something was wrong there
-
mjk
"unknown error" is a bug in and of itself, I'd say. in glib or wherever
-
mjk
no good errors should go unpunished!