Gajim - 2018-06-25


  1. bot Philipp Hörist modified an issue in _gajim_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/issues/9213 >: #9213: < How does Gajim interact with Tor socks interface? >
  2. bot Philipp Hörist modified an issue in _gajim_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/issues/9213 >: #9213: < Use different socks user name per account (Tor) >
  3. bot Philipp Hörist modified an issue in _gajim_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/issues/9213 >: #9213: < Use different socks user name per account (Tor) >
  4. bot Daniel modified an issue in _gajim_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/issues/9213 >: #9213: < Use different socks user name per account (Tor) >
  5. bot norraxx created an issue in _gajim_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/issues/9216 >: #9216: < Bug >
  6. bot norraxx modified an issue in _gajim_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/issues/9216 >: #9216: < Bug >
  7. bot norraxx modified an issue in _gajim_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/issues/9216 >: #9216: < Bug >
  8. bot norraxx modified an issue in _gajim_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/issues/9216 >: #9216: < Bug >
  9. bot Daniel closed an issue in _gajim_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/issues/9216 >: #9216: < Bug >
  10. Link Mauve Zash: it wasn’t an emoji, it was the normal ™ character, U+2122.
  11. Zash Link Mauve: It seems to be treated as an emoji in Gajim
  12. lovetox there is no difference between "normal" characters and emojis
  13. lovetox its just a unicode codepoint 🙂
  14. lovetox and for some we have fancy icons and for some we have not
  15. Zash it was rendered big and blue and for whatever reason not included in quotes
  16. Link Mauve lovetox, there is a codepoint for changing some non-emoji characters into colour emoji, so for all codepoints before emoji you shouldn’t replace them with images.
  17. Link Mauve ™ for instance is a codepoint from the BMP, so not an emoji by definition.
  18. lovetox tell that to google and all other emoji pack suppliers 🙂
  19. zuglufttier Is Gajim able to store the config in a pep node, like in XEP-0223?
  20. zuglufttier It does seem to work for the bookmarks.
  21. zuglufttier It would be nice to have several Gajims with a unified look.
  22. Steven Roose zuglufttier: that would be very awesome :)
  23. zuglufttier Not that I'm a programming god but that doesn't look too hard because it's a plain text file.
  24. bot Sophie Herold updated a merge request for _gajim/master_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/merge_requests/266 >: WIP: Give dialogs more consistent look
  25. bot Sophie Herold proposed a new merge request for _gajim/master_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/merge_requests/281 >: Fixes transient_for some windows (fixes #9180)
  26. bot Sophie Herold updated a merge request for _gajim/master_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/merge_requests/281 >: Fixes transient_for some windows (fixes #9180)
  27. bot Sophie Herold updated a merge request for _gajim/master_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/merge_requests/281 >: Fixes transient_for some windows (fixes #9180)
  28. bot Sophie Herold updated a merge request for _gajim/master_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/merge_requests/266 >: WIP: Give dialogs more consistent look
  29. bot Philipp Hörist closed a merge request for _gajim/master_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/merge_requests/281 >: Fixes transient_for some windows (fixes #9180)
  30. bot Philipp Hörist pushed 2 commits to branch _refs/heads/master_ of _gajim_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim >: *a0bc6f01* < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/commit/a0bc6f0155386557cbabd30fbd7f595c7d1aa065 > Refactor search code into own module *c39da015* < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/commit/c39da015cc5b07a0c207146ead4bc4d32373a3b4 > Refactor annotations code into own module
  31. concerto o/
  32. concerto gajim-default-nightly v20180620-1, Debian Stable. ``` Gajim seems to format things like *bold* even within multiline code blocks. ``` Is this intended?
  33. lovetox i dont think gajim supports multiline codeblocks
  34. lovetox but correct me if im wrong
  35. lovetox at least what you posted seems not to be formated special
  36. concerto lovetox: ah, you're right.
  37. meaz On gajim, I got those kind of notifications "username was ejected: none" . What does that mean?
  38. bot Leonardo Roman created an issue in _gajim_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/issues/9217 >: #9217: < Error when clicking on a message popup >
  39. lovetox hm meaz never heard of that
  40. lovetox you mean if you join a muc?
  41. meaz not when I join it lovetox . It is already opened.
  42. lovetox can you make a screenshot
  43. meaz https://disroot.org:5281/upload/BJJ_YyO67MwvzTqs/ejected.png
  44. meaz all the green lines...
  45. meaz perhaps more of a server problem though...
  46. bot Daniel closed an issue in _gajim_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/issues/9217 >: #9217: < Error when clicking on a message popup >
  47. lovetox weird never saw this
  48. lovetox can you open the xml console for that account
  49. lovetox and just let it run
  50. lovetox if it comes again
  51. lovetox look if you can find the stanza that causes this
  52. meaz ok I'll check that lovetox
  53. bot Philipp Hörist pushed 2 commits to branch _refs/heads/master_ of _gajim_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim >: *f382ce2a* < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/commit/f382ce2a6ce552262f8de26f90381ef8fd8b4463 > Remove unused code *b74706af* < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/commit/b74706afcf41cd9d4efc48f032705e16bc22160a > Refactor roster item exchange code into own module
  54. bluemoon I see you fixed the 2 months back log on join in the room lmao
  55. lovetox hm no, not that i know of
  56. bluemoon interesting not as long this time
  57. bluemoon I see you updated fratpak to 1.03
  58. lovetox also no
  59. bluemoon ?
  60. bluemoon well somone did
  61. bluemoon cause i have 1.03 right noq
  62. bluemoon now
  63. bluemoon help about says 1.03 and I had 1.02 and I rean flatpak update is how i got it
  64. bluemoon rean = ran
  65. bluemoon Commit: 529703f058be863ce9d6d385f9b6fc38aeb2b8284b3c0d135ebb25769f5dd351
  66. lovetox seems Andre did that
  67. bluemoon oh okay
  68. bluemoon maybe andre changed the 2 month back log too :)
  69. bot Philipp Hörist pushed 2 commits to branch _refs/heads/master_ of _gajim_ < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim >: *8fa1ee46* < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/commit/8fa1ee4617e6c02a0773b71a76d3369f31e50489 > Refactor last activity code into own module *129f72bf* < https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/commit/129f72bf8e43b91a5a824457949a74b8434c4053 > Refactor http auth code into own module