Gajim - 2017-11-01


  1. rom1dep Because git UI makes no sense
  2. rom1dep Because git UI makes no sense
  3. rom1dep Because git UI makes no sense
  4. zuglufttier git wants a username from me now in order to do a "git pull" from https://dev.gajim.org.
  5. zuglufttier git wants a username from me now in order to do a "git pull" from https://dev.gajim.org.
  6. zuglufttier git wants a username from me now in order to do a "git pull" from https://dev.gajim.org.
  7. zuglufttier Which was not the case before, did anything change?
  8. zuglufttier Which was not the case before, did anything change?
  9. zuglufttier Which was not the case before, did anything change?
  10. zuglufttier It seems that only members of the project are now allowed to checkout the source code.
  11. zuglufttier It seems that only members of the project are now allowed to checkout the source code.
  12. zuglufttier It seems that only members of the project are now allowed to checkout the source code.
  13. mdosch Yep, I tried and was also asked for a user name
  14. mdosch Yep, I tried and was also asked for a user name
  15. mdosch Yep, I tried and was also asked for a user name
  16. lovetox oh sorry
  17. lovetox oh sorry
  18. lovetox oh sorry
  19. lovetox should work now
  20. lovetox should work now
  21. lovetox should work now
  22. lovetox mdosch, zuglufttier
  23. lovetox mdosch, zuglufttier
  24. lovetox mdosch, zuglufttier
  25. zuglufttier lovetox, thanks! Working again.
  26. zuglufttier lovetox, thanks! Working again.
  27. zuglufttier lovetox, thanks! Working again.
  28. mdosch yep, works 👍
  29. mdosch yep, works 👍
  30. mdosch yep, works 👍
  31. mdosch Hmm, OMEMO is deactivated now for all contacts I used it before on the nightly. Reactivating works, but why did it get deactivated?
  32. mdosch Hmm, OMEMO is deactivated now for all contacts I used it before on the nightly. Reactivating works, but why did it get deactivated?
  33. mdosch Hmm, OMEMO is deactivated now for all contacts I used it before on the nightly. Reactivating works, but why did it get deactivated?
  34. zuglufttier mdosch, not the case for me.
  35. zuglufttier mdosch, not the case for me.
  36. zuglufttier mdosch, not the case for me.
  37. lovetox the only code that is known to me that disables a plugin, is the plugininstaller if we update a plugin
  38. lovetox the only code that is known to me that disables a plugin, is the plugininstaller if we update a plugin
  39. lovetox the only code that is known to me that disables a plugin, is the plugininstaller if we update a plugin
  40. mdosch OK, dunno where it came from
  41. mdosch OK, dunno where it came from
  42. mdosch OK, dunno where it came from
  43. mdosch I am not aware of a plugin update the last days
  44. mdosch I am not aware of a plugin update the last days
  45. mdosch I am not aware of a plugin update the last days
  46. mdosch Hmm, also now I got two messages to gajim but not to conversations although carbons are active on my server
  47. mdosch Hmm, also now I got two messages to gajim but not to conversations although carbons are active on my server
  48. mdosch Hmm, also now I got two messages to gajim but not to conversations although carbons are active on my server
  49. mdosch And I didn't update prosody but of course today came a new nightly of gajim
  50. mdosch And I didn't update prosody but of course today came a new nightly of gajim
  51. mdosch And I didn't update prosody but of course today came a new nightly of gajim
  52. mdosch Did you change anything related to carbons?
  53. mdosch Did you change anything related to carbons?
  54. mdosch Did you change anything related to carbons?
  55. lovetox no
  56. lovetox no
  57. lovetox no
  58. lovetox i dont get it you receive a message in gajim but not in conversations
  59. lovetox i dont get it you receive a message in gajim but not in conversations
  60. lovetox i dont get it you receive a message in gajim but not in conversations
  61. mdosch weird
  62. mdosch weird
  63. mdosch weird
  64. mdosch yep
  65. mdosch yep
  66. mdosch yep
  67. lovetox and you think i changed something in gajim!?
  68. lovetox and you think i changed something in gajim!?
  69. lovetox and you think i changed something in gajim!?
  70. lovetox do you not want to receive the message ^^?
  71. lovetox do you not want to receive the message ^^?
  72. lovetox do you not want to receive the message ^^?
  73. mdosch As I didn't update conversations or prosody but today came a gajim update (nightly) so gajim is the only thing changed
  74. mdosch As I didn't update conversations or prosody but today came a gajim update (nightly) so gajim is the only thing changed
  75. mdosch As I didn't update conversations or prosody but today came a gajim update (nightly) so gajim is the only thing changed
  76. mdosch I wonder why it is not carbon copied to conversations
  77. mdosch I wonder why it is not carbon copied to conversations
  78. mdosch I wonder why it is not carbon copied to conversations
  79. lovetox did a contact of yours send it?
  80. lovetox did a contact of yours send it?
  81. lovetox did a contact of yours send it?
  82. mdosch yep
  83. mdosch yep
  84. mdosch yep
  85. lovetox does he use encryption?
  86. lovetox does he use encryption?
  87. lovetox does he use encryption?
  88. mdosch yes, but she has all my omemo keys and earlier messages appeared on all my clients
  89. mdosch yes, but she has all my omemo keys and earlier messages appeared on all my clients
  90. mdosch yes, but she has all my omemo keys and earlier messages appeared on all my clients
  91. mdosch but the latest two only in gajim
  92. mdosch but the latest two only in gajim
  93. mdosch but the latest two only in gajim
  94. lovetox look in gajim fingerprint widnow are there inactive keys?
  95. lovetox look in gajim fingerprint widnow are there inactive keys?
  96. lovetox look in gajim fingerprint widnow are there inactive keys?
  97. lovetox is your conversation device one of these
  98. lovetox is your conversation device one of these
  99. lovetox is your conversation device one of these
  100. mdosch no conversations fingerprint is active
  101. mdosch no conversations fingerprint is active
  102. mdosch no conversations fingerprint is active
  103. mdosch I see my own messages on all my devices and usually also all incoming messages but the last two messages where lost on my mobile
  104. mdosch I see my own messages on all my devices and usually also all incoming messages but the last two messages where lost on my mobile
  105. mdosch I see my own messages on all my devices and usually also all incoming messages but the last two messages where lost on my mobile
  106. mdosch weird, i never had message loss before
  107. mdosch weird, i never had message loss before
  108. mdosch weird, i never had message loss before
  109. lovetox relog in conversations, see if they are really lost
  110. lovetox relog in conversations, see if they are really lost
  111. lovetox relog in conversations, see if they are really lost
  112. lovetox because on relog, conversation should pull them from mam
  113. lovetox because on relog, conversation should pull them from mam
  114. lovetox because on relog, conversation should pull them from mam
  115. lovetox the most likely reason for this error is, that for some reason the message was not encrypted to your phone
  116. lovetox the most likely reason for this error is, that for some reason the message was not encrypted to your phone
  117. lovetox the most likely reason for this error is, that for some reason the message was not encrypted to your phone
  118. lovetox reason for this could be for example that your devicelist in pep got reset
  119. lovetox reason for this could be for example that your devicelist in pep got reset
  120. lovetox reason for this could be for example that your devicelist in pep got reset
  121. mdosch I wonder as the messages from this contact half an hour earlier also appeared on all device
  122. mdosch I wonder as the messages from this contact half an hour earlier also appeared on all device
  123. mdosch I wonder as the messages from this contact half an hour earlier also appeared on all device
  124. lovetox and the device of your contact has a not up to date devicelist
  125. lovetox and the device of your contact has a not up to date devicelist
  126. lovetox and the device of your contact has a not up to date devicelist
  127. mdosch Relog didn't make them appear
  128. mdosch Relog didn't make them appear
  129. mdosch Relog didn't make them appear
  130. lovetox then conversations is not able to decrypt them
  131. lovetox then conversations is not able to decrypt them
  132. lovetox then conversations is not able to decrypt them
  133. mdosch hmm, so I tell her to relog as well
  134. mdosch hmm, so I tell her to relog as well
  135. mdosch hmm, so I tell her to relog as well
  136. lovetox tell her to write one message unencrypted, then you certainly know its about encryption
  137. lovetox tell her to write one message unencrypted, then you certainly know its about encryption
  138. lovetox tell her to write one message unencrypted, then you certainly know its about encryption
  139. lovetox and for further investigation i would start debug mode on conversations
  140. lovetox and for further investigation i would start debug mode on conversations
  141. lovetox and for further investigation i would start debug mode on conversations
  142. lovetox and see what the log says in the moment the message arrives
  143. lovetox and see what the log says in the moment the message arrives
  144. lovetox and see what the log says in the moment the message arrives
  145. mdosch ok thx. will dig into it but right now my contact is not active
  146. mdosch ok thx. will dig into it but right now my contact is not active
  147. mdosch ok thx. will dig into it but right now my contact is not active
  148. mdosch somehow she managed to disable one omemo key...
  149. mdosch somehow she managed to disable one omemo key...
  150. mdosch somehow she managed to disable one omemo key...
  151. mdosch as she never goes to this settings this might have happened with an unlocked phone in the pocket going crazy...
  152. mdosch as she never goes to this settings this might have happened with an unlocked phone in the pocket going crazy...
  153. mdosch as she never goes to this settings this might have happened with an unlocked phone in the pocket going crazy...
  154. mdosch :-/
  155. mdosch :-/
  156. mdosch :-/
  157. Holger .oXMPP FAQ, Q#1: "It doesn't work, what should I do?" A: "Disable OMEMO."
  158. Holger .oXMPP FAQ, Q#1: "It doesn't work, what should I do?" A: "Disable OMEMO."
  159. Holger .oXMPP FAQ, Q#1: "It doesn't work, what should I do?" A: "Disable OMEMO."
  160. mdosch 😂
  161. mdosch 😂
  162. mdosch 😂
  163. mdosch In gajim nightly builds you can set an alias for an account but it is neither used in the menu bar accounts nor at right click on all accounts. Is this intended behaviour or a bug? If the latter: is it already known or should be reported?
  164. mdosch In gajim nightly builds you can set an alias for an account but it is neither used in the menu bar accounts nor at right click on all accounts. Is this intended behaviour or a bug? If the latter: is it already known or should be reported?
  165. mdosch In gajim nightly builds you can set an alias for an account but it is neither used in the menu bar accounts nor at right click on all accounts. Is this intended behaviour or a bug? If the latter: is it already known or should be reported?
  166. zuglufttier mdosch, for me, it changes in the roster.
  167. zuglufttier mdosch, for me, it changes in the roster.
  168. zuglufttier mdosch, for me, it changes in the roster.
  169. mdosch For me it didn't
  170. mdosch For me it didn't
  171. mdosch For me it didn't
  172. mdosch But I have my rosters merged. But for the two options described you see servername and servername1 not the alias
  173. mdosch But I have my rosters merged. But for the two options described you see servername and servername1 not the alias
  174. mdosch But I have my rosters merged. But for the two options described you see servername and servername1 not the alias
  175. lovetox thats right it seems i forgot this
  176. lovetox thats right it seems i forgot this
  177. lovetox thats right it seems i forgot this
  178. Tschaeggaer hey. another thing: for me the conversations emojis just look like weird symbols on gajim. is it me or gajim?^^
  179. Tschaeggaer hey. another thing: for me the conversations emojis just look like weird symbols on gajim. is it me or gajim?^^
  180. Tschaeggaer hey. another thing: for me the conversations emojis just look like weird symbols on gajim. is it me or gajim?^^
  181. lovetox gajim version?
  182. lovetox gajim version?
  183. lovetox gajim version?
  184. Tschaeggaer 0.16.8
  185. Tschaeggaer 0.16.8
  186. Tschaeggaer 0.16.8
  187. lovetox does not support unicode emojis
  188. lovetox does not support unicode emojis
  189. lovetox does not support unicode emojis
  190. lovetox you can switch to master branch
  191. lovetox you can switch to master branch
  192. lovetox you can switch to master branch
  193. Tschaeggaer I'll give that a try
  194. Tschaeggaer I'll give that a try
  195. Tschaeggaer I'll give that a try
  196. lovetox Link Mauve, is mam for muc activated on jabber-fr?
  197. lovetox Link Mauve, is mam for muc activated on jabber-fr?
  198. lovetox Link Mauve, is mam for muc activated on jabber-fr?
  199. lovetox because i dont see a stanza-id added to groupchat messages
  200. lovetox because i dont see a stanza-id added to groupchat messages
  201. lovetox because i dont see a stanza-id added to groupchat messages
  202. Link Mauve lovetox, yes it is.
  203. Link Mauve lovetox, yes it is.
  204. Link Mauve lovetox, yes it is.
  205. Link Mauve … I think.
  206. Link Mauve … I think.
  207. Link Mauve … I think.
  208. Link Mauve lovetox, you’re testing on chat.jabberfr.org?
  209. Link Mauve lovetox, you’re testing on chat.jabberfr.org?
  210. Link Mauve lovetox, you’re testing on chat.jabberfr.org?
  211. lovetox yes
  212. lovetox yes
  213. lovetox yes
  214. Link Mauve I see it in the code of the module at least.
  215. Link Mauve I see it in the code of the module at least.
  216. Link Mauve I see it in the code of the module at least.
  217. lovetox but stanza id must be supplied or not?
  218. lovetox but stanza id must be supplied or not?
  219. lovetox but stanza id must be supplied or not?
  220. Link Mauve But I indeed don’t see it when I send a message.
  221. Link Mauve But I indeed don’t see it when I send a message.
  222. Link Mauve But I indeed don’t see it when I send a message.
  223. Link Mauve I don’t see it in the archive either.
  224. Link Mauve I don’t see it in the archive either.
  225. Link Mauve I don’t see it in the archive either.
  226. Link Mauve Nvm, I wasn’t looking at the correct one. ^^
  227. Link Mauve Nvm, I wasn’t looking at the correct one. ^^
  228. Link Mauve Nvm, I wasn’t looking at the correct one. ^^
  229. lovetox maybe the argument here is, muc announces mam:2, so message id == archive id
  230. lovetox maybe the argument here is, muc announces mam:2, so message id == archive id
  231. lovetox maybe the argument here is, muc announces mam:2, so message id == archive id
  232. lovetox no need to supply, but the same argument could be made for non muc messages
  233. lovetox no need to supply, but the same argument could be made for non muc messages
  234. lovetox no need to supply, but the same argument could be made for non muc messages
  235. Link Mauve That’s wrong though.
  236. Link Mauve That’s wrong though.
  237. Link Mauve That’s wrong though.
  238. Link Mauve And both ids are different.
  239. Link Mauve And both ids are different.
  240. Link Mauve And both ids are different.
  241. lovetox not with mam2
  242. lovetox not with mam2
  243. lovetox not with mam2
  244. lovetox clients MUST NOT interpret XEP-0359 IDs in messages as archive IDs unless the server advertises support for 'urn:xmpp:mam:2' specifically.
  245. lovetox clients MUST NOT interpret XEP-0359 IDs in messages as archive IDs unless the server advertises support for 'urn:xmpp:mam:2' specifically.
  246. lovetox clients MUST NOT interpret XEP-0359 IDs in messages as archive IDs unless the server advertises support for 'urn:xmpp:mam:2' specifically.
  247. lovetox ah in stanza ids
  248. lovetox ah in stanza ids
  249. lovetox ah in stanza ids
  250. lovetox i read that wrong
  251. lovetox i read that wrong
  252. lovetox i read that wrong
  253. Link Mauve Of course, but stanza-id and not @id.
  254. Link Mauve Of course, but stanza-id and not @id.
  255. Link Mauve Of course, but stanza-id and not @id.
  256. lovetox ok since i have more chats open, i see the gui is not good for seeing what chat has new messages
  257. lovetox ok since i have more chats open, i see the gui is not good for seeing what chat has new messages
  258. lovetox ok since i have more chats open, i see the gui is not good for seeing what chat has new messages
  259. debacle question about gtk3 branch of url_image_preview: the version number is still 0.5.6 (i.e. below the 1.0.1 of master). Is this intentional?
  260. debacle question about gtk3 branch of url_image_preview: the version number is still 0.5.6 (i.e. below the 1.0.1 of master). Is this intentional?
  261. debacle question about gtk3 branch of url_image_preview: the version number is still 0.5.6 (i.e. below the 1.0.1 of master). Is this intentional?
  262. SaltyBones i have contact that i m trying to use omemo with
  263. SaltyBones but I cannot find any fingerprint in the list
  264. SaltyBones they are all trusted
  265. SaltyBones but it says ‎[00:25:07] ‎To send an encrypted message, you have to first trust the fingerprint of your contact!