Gajim - 2017-09-21

  1. mrDoctorWho Hi. Gajim's Image Preview plugin seems to not honor filesystems' filename length limits
  2. doczkal What does that mean and why is that an issue?
  3. nico Is there a timeframe when gajim will recieve gtk3?
  4. Link Mauve nico, a few years ago.
  5. Link Mauve Just use the master branch.
  6. nico And if I am using windows and am not able to compile it myself?
  7. Link Mauve You can use the nightlies.
  8. Link Mauve See
  9. Link Mauve I don’t know the difference between the portable and the non-portable version, though.
  10. nico is there a nightlies repo for arch?
  11. pep. aur/gajim-git
  12. nico is that the latest version?
  13. pep. It's following master, so I suspect it is yes
  14. pep. That's usually what -git packages are for
  15. Asterix portable: don't installe it on system. You run it in a folder without admin right to install it
  16. debacle Yesterday I merged andre/setuptools over gajim/master. It worked well. Anything still missing?
  17. 7usr7local Just found out, that on OS X 10.10.5 gajim 0.16.8 from macports 2.4.1 does not work with macports packages gdk-pixbuf@2.36.10_X. (No inline images, no avatars) gdk-pixbuf@2.36.10_1 even breaks the download of the list of available plugins (stalls in "set_location"). It works well with gdk-pixbuf2@2.36.6_0
  18. lovetox yes debacle but probably not important for a debian package
  19. lovetox we would like to ship plugins with the package, that is currently broken
  20. debacle lovetox: building with setuptools was easier for me :~)
  21. debacle lovetox: but I did not check the plugins
  22. lovetox no you misunderstand, when you build from source there are no plugins
  23. lovetox but if a package maintainer wants to ship plugins with the package, he can do it right now putting them into the right folder, but setuptools doesnt install them correctly
  24. lovetox but its a small fix
  25. lovetox nothing that will stop us
  26. lovetox :)
  27. lovetox but thats not the linux way anyway i guess
  28. lovetox you would package the plugins
  29. lovetox separatly, and just recommend them
  30. lovetox but on windows i need this :)
  31. debacle lovetox: OK, now I understand
  32. debacle lovetox: I'll try to make a Debian package with the setuptools stuff patched in
  33. debacle That way it gets some testing :~)
  34. lovetox yeah nice
  35. lovetox or you wait a few days and then we merge it anywy
  36. debacle lovetox: sounds good! I'm not sure whether I have enough time in the days anyway...
  37. debacle and I need to upgrade nbxmpp from 0.5.4 to 0.5.6 anyway, right?
  38. bot Yann Leboulanger pushed 2 commits to branch _refs/heads/master_ of _gajim_ <>: *3e1ea4a3* <> implement XEP-0380. Fixes #8734 *0c167b65* <> Merge branch 'master' into 'master' implement XEP-0380. Fixes #8734 Closes #8734 See merge request !133
  39. lovetox yes even last git
  40. lovetox i think we make a nbxmpp release the next days
  41. pep. Asterix, thanks for 0380 :)
  42. Asterix 😉
  43. lovetox pep, this still needs a bit of work in the plugins for it to work perfectly, right now eme is only used if there is no plugin installed that can handle the message. if a plugin is available and fails it should be the responsibility of the plugin to inform the user correctly
  44. lovetox but especially omemo likes to drop messages that cant be decrypted
  45. pep. right
  46. pep. That's a start
  47. bot Philipp Hörist pushed 1 commit to branch _refs/heads/master_ of _gajim_ <>: *7e475705* <> Add simple log instance getter
  48. bot Yann Leboulanger pushed 1 commit to branch _refs/heads/master_ of _gajim_ <>: *28184273* <> annouce XEP-0380 support