Gajim - 2017-06-05


  1. Darlan Welcome!
  2. Asterix Hey Darlan, you're back too ;)
  3. Darlan Yes so :)
  4. Asterix it's a long time I haven't sine a dozen of impossible tickets opened in 5 minutes ;)
  5. Link Mauve Asterix, even though I tried to. :(
  6. Asterix yes I saw, but you stopped at 10 ;)
  7. Link Mauve :D
  8. mimi89999 Asterix‎: I am using the gajim-default-nightly package
  9. mimi89999 michel@debian:~$ gajim Gajim needs python-nbxmpp >= 0.5.6 to run. Quitting…
  10. mimi89999 It depends on python3-nbxmpp-nightly, which is old...
  11. mimi89999 python3-nbxmpp is on 0.5.6-1, but I can't install it because it conflicts.
  12. mimi89999 lovetox‎:
  13. lovetox hm damn :)
  14. lovetox i wrote asterix, to look into it
  15. mdosch mimi89999, python3-nbxmpp worked well for me on two machines. One is stretch and one is sid, I guess you're running jessie?
  16. mimi89999 Stretch
  17. mdosch That's weird
  18. mimi89999 it works for me as well. The issue is that it is conflicting
  19. mdosch What means conflicting? It will replace the currently installed version and all works well. At least for me the installation went smoothly
  20. mdosch you have pastebin enabled in this muc?
  21. mimi89999 michel@debian:~$ sudo apt -t unstable install python3-nbxmpp Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances Lecture des informations d'état... Fait Les paquets suivants seront ENLEVÉS : gajim-default-nightly python3-nbxmpp-nightly Les NOUVEAUX paquets suivants seront installés : python3-nbxmpp 0 mis à jour, 1 nouvellement installés, 2 à enlever et 208 non mis à jour. Il est nécessaire de prendre 67,7 ko dans les archives. Après cette opération, 17,6 Mo d'espace disque seront libérés. Souhaitez-vous continuer ? [O/n] n Annulation.
  22. mimi89999 yes
  23. mdosch apt install python3-nbxmpp Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut. Statusinformationen werden eingelesen.... Fertig Die folgenden Pakete werden ENTFERNT: python3-nbxmpp-nightly Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden installiert: python3-nbxmpp 0 aktualisiert, 1 neu installiert, 1 zu entfernen und 31 nicht aktualisiert. Es müssen 67,7 kB an Archiven heruntergeladen werden. Nach dieser Operation werden 18,4 kB Plattenplatz zusätzlich benutzt. Möchten Sie fortfahren? [J/n] J Holen:1 ftp://ftp.gajim.org/debian unstable/main amd64 python3-nbxmpp all 0.5.6-1 [67,7 kB] Es wurden 67,7 kB in 0 s geholt (91,3 kB/s). Laden der Fehlerberichte … Erledigt »Found/Fixed«-Informationen werden ausgewertet … Erledigt (Lese Datenbank ... 143225 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.) Entfernen von python3-nbxmpp-nightly (20170420-1) ... Vormals nicht ausgewähltes Paket python3-nbxmpp wird gewählt. (Lese Datenbank ... 143200 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.) Vorbereitung zum Entpacken von .../python3-nbxmpp_0.5.6-1_all.deb ... Entpacken von python3-nbxmpp (0.5.6-1) ... python3-nbxmpp (0.5.6-1) wird eingerichtet ... Prüfe Prozesse... Prüfe Linux-Kernel... Der laufende Kernel ist aktuell. Es müssen keine Dienste neugestartet werden. Es müssen keine Container neu gestartet werden. Es gibt keine Nutzer-Sitzungen mit veralteten Prozessen.
  24. mdosch sorry, german
  25. mimi89999 mdosch‎: gajim-default-nightly depends on python3-nbxmpp-nightly
  26. mimi89999 The former will be uninstalled...
  27. mdosch Ah sorry, I got it wrong. You installed the nightly. I am running the master from git. Ok, so it seems the dependency for gajim-nightly package has to be changed.
  28. lovetox no why
  29. lovetox the nightly should depend on nightlys
  30. mimi89999 So python3-nbxmpp-nightly should be updated.
  31. lovetox yeah
  32. lovetox the automatic build seems not to work
  33. mimi89999 2nd issue:
  34. mimi89999 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/gajim/src/common/helpers.py", line 192, in prep server = nameprep.prepare(server) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nbxmpp/stringprepare.py", line 205, in prepare result.append(self.nameprep(label)) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nbxmpp/stringprepare.py", line 216, in nameprep self.check_prohibiteds(label) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nbxmpp/stringprepare.py", line 212, in check_prohibiteds raise UnicodeError("Invalid character %s" % repr(c)) UnicodeError: Invalid character '[' During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nbxmpp/dispatcher_nb.py", line 498, in dispatch handler['func'](session, stanza) File "/usr/share/gajim/src/common/connection_handlers.py", line 1514, in _ErrorCB stanza=iq_obj)) File "/usr/share/gajim/src/common/nec.py", line 74, in push_incoming_event if event_object.generate(): File "/usr/share/gajim/src/common/connection_handlers_events.py", line 690, in generate self.get_jid_resource(check_fake_jid=True) File "/usr/share/gajim/src/common/connection_handlers_events.py", line 79, in get_jid_resource self.fjid = helpers.get_full_jid_from_iq(self.stanza) File "/usr/share/gajim/src/common/helpers.py", line 845, in get_full_jid_from_iq return parse_jid(str(iq_obj.getFrom())) File "/usr/share/gajim/src/common/helpers.py", line 118, in parse_jid return prep(*decompose_jid(jidstring)) File "/usr/share/gajim/src/common/helpers.py", line 194, in prep raise InvalidFormat(_('Invalid character in hostname.')) common.helpers.InvalidFormat: Caractère non valide dans le nom d'hôte.
  35. lovetox seems like you get iqs with invalid hostnames
  36. mimi89999 That shouldn't make Gajim freeze...
  37. lovetox you didnt say it freezes
  38. mimi89999 I see the error window with that message.
  39. lovetox thats not freezing
  40. lovetox thats an exception
  41. lovetox which is shown to the user
  42. mimi89999 If I close it, I can't use Gajim. It is frozen. Looks like the exception is fatal.
  43. Link Mauve Err, [ is valid in a domain, it marks the beginning of an IPv6.
  44. lovetox i never saw something like that, can you give an example
  45. Link Mauve linkmauve@[2a01:e35:2e2f:fbb0:d0:4ff:fec0:dbb3]/poezio for example.
  46. lovetox so you are talking about the hostname, not the domain name?
  47. lovetox thats not a domain for me
  48. lovetox im not sure on the definition though
  49. Link Mauve lovetox, it’s called domainpart in RFC 7622.
  50. Link Mauve What you are looking for is IP-literal in RFC 6874.
  51. Link Mauve Oh right, or linkmauve@[fe80::d0:4ff:fec0:dbb3%eth0]/poezio ^^
  52. lovetox mimi89999, do you have local server running?
  53. mimi89999 lovetox: I am using my own server, but it is on another machine with a domain...
  54. lovetox maybe it doesnt include this domain in all stanzas
  55. lovetox but its a good test case, i will try to fix that and send you a patch
  56. lovetox but it would be good if you could provide the stanza that triggers that
  57. lovetox maybe with running gajim with -v
  58. Marzanna lovetox: >Marzanna im curious could you see which nbxmpp version you use? nightly version 20170531
  59. test123123123 hi guys
  60. test123123123 I have a question concerning jingle voice and audio calls
  61. test123123123 how are they encrypted?
  62. test123123123 is zrtp encryption implemented yet?
  63. lovetox no
  64. lovetox i dont think they are encrypted
  65. test123123123 lovetox: not even tls?
  66. lovetox i dont know to be honest
  67. test123123123 let's hope somebody does
  68. lovetox if you have interest in audio/video via xmpp
  69. lovetox i would recommend jitsi
  70. Netronix Hi everyone, OMEMO seems to not no longer works in conferences rooms with 3 or 4 people
  71. Netronix do you know if there is a way to diagnose the problem ?
  72. Netronix it used to work for us but now we can't send messages
  73. Netronix we are "allowed to" in gajim but the message never appear
  74. lovetox linux or windows?
  75. lovetox Netronix,
  76. Netronix windows
  77. Netronix all Windows
  78. lovetox does it work for no one?
  79. lovetox or only one person
  80. mimi89999 Netronix? Never heard of that OS...
  81. Netronix lovetox, currently 3 persons out of four can't send message but a last one can send
  82. Netronix everyone receives the messages and are well encrypted
  83. lovetox how many of these people are on the same server?
  84. Netronix 2
  85. lovetox did you maybe restart the server recently?
  86. Netronix ow, I don't know because not everybody owns the servers
  87. Netronix some are public servers
  88. lovetox kk, but i guess you restarted gajim once since the problem did occur?
  89. Netronix yeah every one did
  90. lovetox did someone change the room setting maybe
  91. lovetox are you admin of the room?
  92. lovetox can you disconnect from the room
  93. lovetox then rejoin
  94. lovetox and tell me if you see this printed
  95. Netronix yes I'm admin
  96. lovetox "Any occupant is allowed to see your full JID"
  97. Netronix JID ok
  98. lovetox that means yes?
  99. Netronix yes
  100. Netronix with members only and persistant room
  101. lovetox so if you are in the room and go to the fingerprint tab
  102. lovetox do you have a fingerprint for all the members?
  103. Netronix yes
  104. lovetox and you are not the one person that can still send messages?
  105. Netronix lovetox, hold on
  106. Netronix lovetox, problem solved
  107. lovetox what was the problem?
  108. Netronix one of the guys remove a contact and therefore he missed a fingerprint
  109. Netronix the thing is we didn't get the initial OMEMO warning message maybe because we already "paired" in the past
  110. Netronix and getting no warning messages got us confused
  111. lovetox nah groupchat errors could definitly be improved
  112. lovetox so you tell me, one guy deleted one other guy
  113. lovetox and then 3 guys could not send messages at all?
  114. Netronix maybe, can't be precise because we tried many things in short times ...
  115. Netronix One was able to talk
  116. lovetox ah .. yeah ok, i will work on better error messages so we know whats going on next time
  117. Netronix but the two people witch one removed the other contact where not able to speak.
  118. Netronix wow thank's lovetox
  119. Netronix would be great
  120. Netronix I must confess we had hard times to configure the initial "setup" to be able to chat
  121. lovetox yeah could be a lot more user friendly, maybe a "open a omemo groupchat" option that has everything setup
  122. Netronix could be good !! with pre-asking fingerprints
  123. Netronix lovetox, thanks for your help !
  124. lovetox np have a good night
  125. Netronix thx you too
  126. bot Philipp Hörist pushed 1 commit to branch _refs/heads/gajim_0.16_ of _gajim_ <https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim>: *3729db5e* <https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/gajim/commit/3729db5ed86a4de18be7a962aa235e8f5e71a36a> Revert "Correctly publish zeroconf txt data" This reverts commit beaa82cfd6f2b5d317952bba9dcbec3dcb7d7d9f