Gajim - 2017-02-04

  1. anotheragency "Requires password" doesnt seem to be anywhere in the list of strings
  2. bot Philipp Hörist pushed 5 commits to branch _refs/heads/master_ of _gajim-plugins_ <>: *75d02380* <> [omemo] Only publish own deviceid if request fails *59baed68* <> [omemo] Dont handle type 'normal' messages Fixes #182 *e26f19d2* <> [omemo] Fix layout in config window Fixes #184 *fddc7de7* <> [omemo] Update CHANGELOG & manifest.ini *37bad708* <> Merge branch 'master' into 'master' Version 1.0.2 Closes #184 and #182 See merge request !18
  3. bot Philipp Hörist pushed 3 commits to branch _refs/heads/master_ of _gajim-plugins_ <>: *da1f2867* <> [gotr] Fix importing python-otr Fixes #187 *0ef31bd0* <> [gotr] Update manifest.ini *f532fcbb* <> Merge branch 'master' into 'master' Version 1.9.8 Closes #187 See merge request !19
  4. kalkin lovetox: Btw we should enable by default (if the server supports it) http upload and image preview
  5. lovetox hm idont get it
  6. lovetox http upload is enabled if the server supports it
  7. lovetox and image preview has nothing to do with a server
  8. kalkin lovetox: is it already?
  9. lovetox it just parses urls
  10. kalkin Yes image preview has nothing to do with server
  11. lovetox you mean include the plugin in a default installation?
  12. kalkin lovetox: yes
  13. Asterix this is a packager request
  14. lovetox i would move httpupload sometime in the future to the core, as it is a valid XEP that gajim can support
  15. lovetox but no time to be honest
  16. kalkin People are complaining that gajim doesn't support images & co. they are surprised and confused that they need to enable plugins for that
  17. kalkin lovetox its just moving the plugin in to the gajim main repo and fixing default settings so the plugin is enabled right?
  18. lovetox no
  19. lovetox i see no reason to have it as plugin
  20. kalkin lovetox: right, but just moving the plugin is simpler
  21. Asterix moving to core mean no more update via plugin installer if it's no more a plugin ...
  22. lovetox it is but that can a package maintainer also do
  23. kalkin Asterix isn't the package manager itself packaged with gajim core and still gets updates?
  24. lovetox yeah i like the plugin in that sense that a new contributor can work on it
  25. lovetox update it fast, work out all bugs etc
  26. lovetox but i think its one year in existence now, i think the most major bugs are out
  27. lovetox but the problem is another kalkin
  28. lovetox for example there are multiple people who dont want image preview per default
  29. lovetox they argue its very insecure
  30. lovetox and leaks much metadata
  31. lovetox which i have to agree, in the current state
  32. lovetox the core problem is that we cant differentiate between httpupload(filetransfer) links
  33. lovetox and normal weblinks
  34. lovetox right now gajim just loads every picture that it gets and displays it
  35. lovetox it doesnt matter if its send with httpupload or not, because we cant really know
  36. lovetox so we need something like implemented
  37. kalkin Ic
  38. kalkin lovetox: thanks for explanation
  39. lovetox but if i think about it, of course it has its value that it is a plugin, because we can update it easily and push this to people
  40. Asterix kalkin: it is but it's still a plugin, it's not merged in core
  41. lovetox though httpupload is already a debian package, could we not add the package to recommended or something like that?
  42. kalkin Asterix: that's what I meant move to gajim/plugins. But know I understand that there is more to it.
  43. kalkin s/know/now
  44. lovetox httpupload plugin in itself is pretty harmless not much code, and a pretty straight xep, but displaying images inline and download files etc i would not count this to httpupload, its just a different thing and not only has to do with httpupload, it is a general filetransfer issue, for example we also dont display jingle transfered pictures inline in chat
  45. kalkin Gajim doesn't have kerberos client support does it?
  46. lovetox at least i never saw code for something like that
  47. lovetox so i think no, but i often failed with my assumptions on what gajim supports ^^
  48. arune I think core should be a plugin to get auto update on Windows 🤡
  49. bot Philipp Hörist pushed 2 commits to branch _refs/heads/master_ of _gajim_ <>: *89f861c8* <> Fix drag and drop on a group. *7932cdf1* <> Merge branch 'drag-and-drop-on-group' into 'master' Fix drag and drop on a group. See merge request !50
  50. kalkin I still can't fork gajim-plugins
  51. lovetox now
  52. lovetox kalkin
  53. lovetox i dont know why it was not changed..
  54. kalkin lovetox: k will try kt later
  55. kalkin Thx
  56. zak Any idea, why messages I send from Gajim to a specific contact who uses Conversations and Gajim are *not* received by Gajim?
  57. zak OMEMO encrypted, but I marked all of his three keys as trusted.
  58. zak Now I disabled OMEMO and messages are sent OTR encrypted, when trying to access OTR settings I get the following error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/user/.local/share/gajim/plugins/gotr/", line 367, in menu_settings_cb dlg = ui.ContactOtrWindow(self, ctx) File "/home/user/.local/share/gajim/plugins/gotr/", line 484, in __init__ fp = potr.human_hash(self.fpr) NameError: global name 'potr' is not defined
  59. lovetox zak update your OTR plugin, i fixed this bug today
  60. lovetox i dont know why they are not received, would need log output for that
  61. zak Where can I access the log output?
  62. lovetox he has to start gajim with "-l gajim.plugin_system.omemo=DEBUG
  63. lovetox windows, should be then in the gajim.log in userdata folder
  64. lovetox on linux you will see stuff in the console
  65. zak nono... linux of course ;)
  66. zak I will do so, just a sec...
  67. zak Hmm... Before the restart I had OMEMO disabled.
  68. zak Now after the restart in the UI it says OMEMO is enabled, but my contact says, the prefix "The following message received from ... was *not encrypted*" is visible.
  69. zak After disabling and re-enabling OMEMO it seems to work now.
  70. zak But when I look in my console output, it seems that *all* messages have been encrypted.
  71. zak Ah, my contact says, he still gets the prefix message...
  72. zak Something is off here.
  73. zak Somehow OTR gets activated automatically everytime I disable OMEMO, although I didn't configure to force OTR in the settings.
  74. zak So I am not able to send an unencrypted message.
  75. Asterix kalkin: we have kerberos support I think. it's in python-nbxmpp
  76. bot Yann Leboulanger pushed 2 commits to branch _refs/heads/master_ of _gajim_ <>: *d3385722* <> Update strings for better english. Thanks to Allan Nordhøy for the suggestions *a7c833f7* <> Merge branch 'translations' into 'master' Update strings for better english. Thanks to Allan Nordhøy for the suggestions See merge request !51