botRSS: Feeds for Gajim
• Ticket #8319 (flooded by "remote-server-not-found") created
The remote server of some of my contact doesn't well. The error message " Error: remote-server-not-found" popups as notification every 30 seconds! The error state should popup just once. (or again when writing an message to the contact)
Steps to reproduce
Software versions
gaji[…]
https://trac.gajim.org/ticket/8319
• []
botRSS: Feeds for Gajim
• Ticket #8319 (flooded by "remote-server-not-found") updated
where are the logs you attached shown? In a chat window?
Could you attach XML logs (from XML console in actions -> advanced menu) to see why those errors are received?
https://trac.gajim.org/ticket/8319#comment:1
mpanUpon re-connecting after a connection to server is lost, does Gajim requires re-signing status with PGP? If yes, is there a reason for that or should I fill a bug report?
botRSS: Feeds for Gajim
• Changeset [16008:bb1902ae63e3]: Added ability to display avatars in all image formats that are …
Added ability to display avatars in all image formats that are supported by pillow (if pillow is available)
https://trac.gajim.org/changeset/bb1902ae63e36a422cb0447e293021e3111e80f3
Asterixmpan: all presences are signes, so Gajim needs the gpg password (or at least from an agent) each time you change presence (reconnecting is a presence change)
mpanAsterix, but why do it need it re-signed? I understand that the first time a presence is posted, it has to be signed — obvious. But why later?
Asterixall presences are to be signed to announce your contact that you support GPG. The spec was written like that
mpanBut this is exactly the same data.
mpan(or not?)
Asterix(outdated spec BTW)
AsterixGajim doesn't store encrypted data
mpanIt’s signed, not encrypted.
Asterixyes, that's the same, we don't store stanza that are sent
mpanAs far as I understand, it works like that: <http://pastebin.com/S8VTct0a>. Right? So why the 2nd presence send would need a signature?
AsterixAll presences are signed that's the protocole.
Asterixeven if we send the same data, the signed result is not stored so it's re-computed on every presence
tmolitorAsterix: I added Support for webp to the hg default Branch...avatars Form conversations are now displayed correctly :)
Asterixtmolitor: yep just saw that. Thanks. GTK doesn't support webp natively??
mpanWould a feature request, to allow override what protocol requires, be turned down immedietly if I post it?
Asterixmpan: If you really want to go there, there is already something like that in Gajim. I don't like to talk about it cause that doesn't follow the protocole: you can ask Gajim not to sign presences. In this case your contact can't know you support GPG, but if they assign you a key, that can talk to you encrypted
Link Mauvetmolitor, ugh, that’s a terrible way to do it, compressing to PNG. >_<
mpanWell… hidden option isn’t probably what I‘m asking for ;)
mpanHowever, where is it?
mpanJust of couriosity, as I want my presences to be signed.
mpan"where”
mpan“where” → “how the property is named”
Asterixgpg_sign_presence in advanced configuration editor
tmolitorAsterix: No...apparently Not...my Code fixed this...and IT degrades nicely if pillow is Not available :)
tmolitorLink Mauve: how would you do IT? Use jpg?
Link MauveNo, just don’t reencode the image to then decode it.
Link MauveA pixbuf is already an uncompressed image view.
Asterixtmolitor: do you still have this problem: #8090
tmolitorAsterix: I don't know...when smacks is enabled this doesn't happen I think...I'll look AT IT eben I'm AT home again...
Asterixtmolitor: thanks
mpanOk, so another question: is there a way to re-send [now] signed presence without reconnecting or changing the presence?
mpanI can’t see anything in GUI for that purpose.
Asterixmiddle click on the account row
mpanEt me edit my status message. Already tried that.
mpanOh, wait… I’m stupid. Just noticed that the pgp agent will not ask me again for the passphrase due to caching -.-
mpannvm, thx :]
mpanAnd I think I’ll solve the issue other way, other place: by making gajim use a special gpg agent that caches signing requests. So the case is closed I think.